Danker Jared F, Anderson John R
Department of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1365-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.032. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
In naturalistic algebra problem solving, the cognitive processes of representation and retrieval are typically confounded, in that transformations of the equations typically require retrieval of mathematical facts. Previous work using cognitive modeling has associated activity in the prefrontal cortex with the retrieval demands of algebra problems and activity in the posterior parietal cortex with the transformational demands of algebra problems, but these regions tend to behave similarly in response to task manipulations (Anderson, J.R., Qin, Y., Sohn, M.-H., Stenger, V.A., Carter, C.S., 2003. An information-processing model of the BOLD response in symbol manipulation tasks. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 10, 241-261; Qin, Y., Carter, C.S., Silk, E.M., Stenger, A., Fissell, K., Goode, A., Anderson, J.R., 2004. The change of brain activation patterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 5686-5691). With this study we attempt to isolate activity in these two regions by using a multi-step algebra task in which transformation (parietal) is manipulated in the first step and retrieval (prefrontal) is manipulated in the second step. Counter to our initial predictions, both brain regions were differentially active during both steps. We designed two cognitive models, one encompassing our initial assumptions and one in which both processes were engaged during both steps. The first model provided a poor fit to the behavioral and neural data, while the second model fit both well. This simultaneously emphasizes the strong relationship between retrieval and representation in mathematical reasoning and demonstrates that cognitive modeling can serve as a useful tool for understanding task manipulations in neuroimaging experiments.
在自然主义的代数问题解决过程中,表征和检索的认知过程通常相互混淆,因为方程的变换通常需要检索数学事实。先前使用认知建模的研究将前额叶皮层的活动与代数问题的检索需求相关联,将顶叶后部皮层的活动与代数问题的变换需求相关联,但这些区域在对任务操作的反应中往往表现相似(安德森,J.R.,秦,Y.,孙,M.-H.,斯滕格,V.A.,卡特,C.S.,2003年。符号操作任务中BOLD反应的信息处理模型。《心理通报与评论》10,241 - 261;秦,Y.,卡特,C.S.,丝绸,E.M.,斯滕格,A.,菲塞尔,K.,古德,A.,安德森,J.R.,2004年。儿童学习代数方程求解时大脑激活模式的变化。《美国国家科学院院刊》101,5686 - 5691)。通过本研究,我们试图通过使用一个多步骤代数任务来分离这两个区域的活动,在该任务中,第一步操纵变换(顶叶),第二步操纵检索(前额叶)。与我们最初的预测相反,在两个步骤中,两个脑区的活动都存在差异。我们设计了两个认知模型,一个包含我们最初的假设,另一个是在两个步骤中两个过程都参与的模型。第一个模型与行为和神经数据拟合不佳,而第二个模型两者拟合良好。这同时强调了数学推理中检索和表征之间的紧密关系,并表明认知建模可以作为理解神经成像实验中任务操作的有用工具。