Cairo M S, Worcester C C, Rucker R W, Hanten S, Amlie R N, Sender L, Hicks D A
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, California 92668.
J Pediatr. 1992 Feb;120(2 Pt 1):281-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80445-7.
We prospectively studied newborn infants with sepsis and neutropenia who were randomly selected to receive standard supportive care and either adjuvant granulocyte transfusions or intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) infusions; 21 infants received granulocyte transfusions and 14 received IVIG infusions. Half of the patients were premature (gestational age less than or equal to 32 weeks); the average postnatal age was 5 days (range 3 to 8 days). All infants had neutropenia by the criteria of Manroe et al., and the mean average bone marrow neutrophil storage pool ranged between 35% and 37%. There were no significant differences with respect to serum IgG, IgA, IgM, and total hemolytic complement values between treatment groups or between survivors and nonsurvivors. Clinical severity as defined by hypoxia, acidosis, and hypotension was similar between treatment groups. Group B streptococcus was the most common organism identified and accounted for almost 33% of all bacterial isolates. There was a significantly different survival rate in the group receiving polymorphonuclear leukocyte transfusions (100%, 21/21) compared with the group receiving IVIG infusions (64%, 9/14; p = less than 0.03). There were no significant complications in either treatment group with respect to fluid overload, secondary infection, blood group sensitization, pulmonary complications, or graft-versus-host disease. This pilot study suggests a possible benefit of granulocyte transfusions compared with 'IVIG therapy in the adjuvant treatment of neonatal neutropenia and overwhelming bacterial sepsis.
我们对患有败血症和中性粒细胞减少症的新生儿进行了前瞻性研究,这些新生儿被随机选择接受标准支持治疗,并分别接受辅助性粒细胞输注或静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)输注;21名婴儿接受了粒细胞输注,14名婴儿接受了IVIG输注。一半的患者为早产儿(胎龄小于或等于32周);平均出生后年龄为5天(范围为3至8天)。所有婴儿均符合门罗等人的中性粒细胞减少症标准,平均骨髓中性粒细胞储存池在35%至37%之间。治疗组之间或存活者与非存活者之间在血清IgG、IgA、IgM和总溶血补体值方面没有显著差异。治疗组之间由缺氧、酸中毒和低血压定义的临床严重程度相似。B组链球菌是最常见的病原体,占所有细菌分离株的近33%。接受多形核白细胞输注的组(100%,21/21)与接受IVIG输注的组(64%,9/14;p<0.03)的存活率有显著差异。在液体超负荷、继发感染、血型致敏、肺部并发症或移植物抗宿主病方面,两个治疗组均无显著并发症。这项初步研究表明,在新生儿中性粒细胞减少症和严重细菌性败血症的辅助治疗中,与IVIG治疗相比,粒细胞输注可能有益。