Gozalo Pedro L, Miller Susan C
Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Department of Community Health, Brown University School of Medicine, Box G-ST211, 2 Stimson Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr;42(2):587-610. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00623.x.
To examine the patient, nursing home (NH), hospice provider, and local market factors associated with the selection of the Medicare hospice benefit by eligible NH residents, and evaluate the causal effect of hospice on end-of-life hospitalization rates.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Secondary data for 1995-1997 for NH residents.
This retrospective cohort study includes NH residents in five states (Kansa, Maine, New York, Ohio, South Dakota) who died in the years 1995-1997. Medicare claims identified hospice enrollment and hospitalizations. Geocoding of NHs, hospice providers, and hospitals was used to identify local markets. The two outcome measures are hospice enrollment and hospitalization of NH residents in their last 30 days of life.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHOD: A file was constructed linking MDS assessments to Medicare claims and denominator files, NH provider files (OSCAR), hospice provider of service files, and the area resource file.
Twenty-six percent of hospice and 44 percent of nonhospice residents were hospitalized in their last 30 days of life (odds ratio [OR] 0.45; 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-0.48). Adjusting for confounders, hospice patients were less likely than nonhospice residents to be hospitalized (OR 0.47; 95 percent CI: 0.45-0.50). Adding inverse propensity score weighting, hospice patients were still less likely than nonhospice residents to be hospitalized (OR 0.56; 95 percent CI: 0.53-0.61).
Hospice selection introduces some bias in the evaluation of the causal effect of hospice on end-of-life hospitalization rates. However, even after adjusting for selection bias, hospice does have a powerful effect in reducing end-of-life hospitalization rates.
研究与符合条件的养老院居民选择医疗保险临终关怀福利相关的患者、养老院、临终关怀服务提供者及当地市场因素,并评估临终关怀对临终住院率的因果效应。
数据来源/研究背景:1995 - 1997年养老院居民的二手数据。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了1995 - 1997年间在堪萨斯州、缅因州、纽约州、俄亥俄州、南达科他州五个州死亡的养老院居民。医疗保险理赔记录确定了临终关怀登记情况和住院情况。通过对养老院、临终关怀服务提供者及医院进行地理编码来确定当地市场。两项结果指标为养老院居民在生命最后30天内的临终关怀登记情况和住院情况。
数据收集/提取方法:构建了一个文件,将最低数据集(MDS)评估与医疗保险理赔记录、分母文件、养老院提供者文件(OSCAR)、临终关怀服务提供者服务文件及区域资源文件相链接。
26%接受临终关怀的居民和44%未接受临终关怀的居民在生命的最后30天内住院(优势比[OR]为0.45;95%置信区间[CI]:0.42 - 0.48)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,接受临终关怀的患者比未接受临终关怀的居民住院可能性更小(OR为0.47;95%置信区间:0.45 - 0.50)。加入逆倾向评分加权后,接受临终关怀的患者仍比未接受临终关怀的居民住院可能性更小(OR为0.56;95%置信区间:0.53 - 0.61)。
临终关怀的选择在评估临终关怀对临终住院率的因果效应时引入了一些偏差。然而,即使在调整选择偏差后,临终关怀在降低临终住院率方面仍具有显著效果。