Ortega Justus D, Farley Claire T
Locomotion Laboratory, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0354, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jun;102(6):2266-73. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00583.2006. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
Elderly adults consume more metabolic energy during walking than young adults. Our study tested the hypothesis that elderly adults consume more metabolic energy during walking than young adults because they perform more individual limb work on the center of mass. Thus we compared how much individual limb work young and elderly adults performed on the center of mass during walking. We measured metabolic rate and ground reaction force while 10 elderly and 10 young subjects walked at 5 speeds between 0.7 and 1.8 m/s. Compared with young subjects, elderly subjects consumed an average of 20% more metabolic energy (P=0.010), whereas they performed an average of 10% less individual limb work during walking over the range of speeds (P=0.028). During the single-support phase, elderly and young subjects both conserved approximately 80% of the center of mass mechanical energy by inverted pendulum energy exchange and performed a similar amount of individual limb work (P=0.473). However, during double support, elderly subjects performed an average of 17% less individual limb work than young subjects (P=0.007) because their forward speed fluctuated less (P=0.006). We conclude that the greater metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults cannot be explained by a difference in individual limb work. Future studies should examine whether a greater metabolic cost of stabilization, reduced muscle efficiency, greater antagonist cocontraction, and/or a greater cost of generating muscle force cause the elevated metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults.
老年人在行走过程中比年轻人消耗更多的代谢能量。我们的研究检验了这样一个假设:老年人在行走过程中比年轻人消耗更多的代谢能量,是因为他们在质心处进行了更多的单个肢体做功。因此,我们比较了年轻人和老年人在行走过程中对质心进行的单个肢体做功量。我们测量了10名老年人和10名年轻人在0.7至1.8米/秒之间的5种速度下行走时的代谢率和地面反作用力。与年轻受试者相比,老年受试者平均多消耗20%的代谢能量(P=0.010),而在该速度范围内行走时,他们进行的单个肢体平均做功量少10%(P=0.028)。在单支撑阶段,老年人和年轻人通过倒立摆能量交换均保留了约80%的质心机械能,并且进行的单个肢体做功量相似(P=0.473)。然而,在双支撑阶段,老年受试者进行的单个肢体平均做功量比年轻受试者少17%(P=0.007),因为他们的前进速度波动较小(P=0.006)。我们得出结论,老年人行走时较高的代谢成本不能用单个肢体做功的差异来解释。未来的研究应该考察,稳定化代谢成本增加、肌肉效率降低、拮抗肌共收缩增加和/或产生肌肉力量的成本增加是否导致了老年人行走时代谢成本升高。