• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Bi-socket ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: high versus low femoral socket placement.

作者信息

Toritsuka Yukiyoshi, Amano Hiroshi, Yamada Yuzo, Hamada Masayuki, Mitsuoka Tomoki, Horibe Shuji, Shino Konsei

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Kansai Rosai Hospital, 3-1-69 Inabaso, Amagasaki, Hyogo 660-0064, Japan.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Jul;15(7):835-46. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0304-1. Epub 2007 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-007-0304-1
PMID:17364204
Abstract

To clarify the importance of the femoral socket location in bi-socket Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Subjects included 261 patients with an average age of 26 years who received ACL reconstruction via the high-femoral socket procedure (Group H) and 43 patients with an average age of 29 years who received ACL reconstruction via the low-femoral socket procedure (Group L) with a minimal follow-up of 24 months. In Group H, the femoral sockets were created at 1:00 or 11:00 and 2:00-2:30 or 9:30-10:00 of the intercondylar notch. In Group L, the two femoral sockets were drilled at 2:00 or 10:00 and 3:00 or 9:00. For the tibial side, a single tunnel was made at the center of the footprint. Evaluation was performed based on the IKDC Knee Examination Form. While 137 knees (52%) were graded as normal, 100 (38%) as nearly normal, 8 (3%) as abnormal, and 2 (1%) as severely abnormal with 14 (5%) re-injury in Group H, 38 knees (74%) were graded as normal, and 7 (16%) as nearly normal with 3 (7%) re-injury in Group L, showing a better subjective evaluation (P = 0.007). The average side-to-side differences in anterior laxity at manual maximum force with the KT-1000 were 1.1 +/- 1.6 mm for Group H and 1.0 +/- 1.6 mm for Group L without statistically significant differences excluding re-injured cases. There were 204 patients (83%) from Group H and 33 (83%) from Group L with values between -2 and 2 mm, while 228 (92%) patients from Group H and 38 (95%) from Group L had values distributed between -3 and 3 mm. While the bi-socket ACL reconstruction provided objectively satisfactory clinical outcomes in more than 90% of the patients, the low-femoral socket placement was found to subjectively achieve better outcomes.

摘要

相似文献

1
Bi-socket ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: high versus low femoral socket placement.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Jul;15(7):835-46. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0304-1. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
2
The mid- to long-term results of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons using Transfix technique.采用Transfix技术行腘绳肌腱前交叉韧带重建的中长期结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Aug;15(8):965-72. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0344-6. Epub 2007 May 15.
3
Outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons.使用腘绳肌腱进行双束前交叉韧带重建的结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 May;17(5):456-63. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0707-7. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
4
Clinical outcome of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction and 3D CT model-based validation of femoral socket aperture position.解剖双束前交叉韧带重建的临床结果及基于三维CT模型的股骨隧道开口位置验证
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Sep;22(9):2194-201. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2663-0. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
5
Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: A prospective study.采用带EndoButton股骨固定的自体多股绳肌腱进行单隧道与双隧道前交叉韧带重建的前瞻性研究。
Arthroscopy. 2001 Oct;17(8):801-7. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(01)90002-7.
6
The effect of graft placement on the clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study.移植物放置对前交叉韧带重建临床结果的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Jul;15(7):879-87. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0295-y. Epub 2007 Mar 17.
7
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft directly fixed to cortical bone: 5-year results.采用双环半腱肌和股薄肌腱移植直接固定于皮质骨的前交叉韧带重建:5年随访结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Mar;13(2):81-91. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0553-1. Epub 2004 Oct 16.
8
A retrospective review of bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons fixed with a metal round cannulated interference screw in the femur.对采用金属圆形空心加压螺钉固定于股骨的腘绳肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建术后骨隧道扩大情况的回顾性研究。
Arthroscopy. 2006 Oct;22(10):1093-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.017.
9
Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?前内侧入路钻孔是否能改善前交叉韧带重建中足迹放置情况?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1679-89. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4847-7. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
10
Two-bundle, four-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.双束四隧道前交叉韧带重建术
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Jul;14(7):629-36. doi: 10.1007/s00167-005-0002-9. Epub 2005 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons via an outside-in approach.经皮外入路采用腘绳肌腱进行解剖双束前交叉韧带重建的结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1222-30. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2950-4. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
2
Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the clock face representation as used to describe the femoral intercondylar notch.描述股骨髁间窝时使用钟面图表示法的组内和组间信度。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Aug;19(8):1265-70. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1389-5. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
3
Outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons.

本文引用的文献

1
Graft length changes in the bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between isometric and anatomic femoral tunnel placement.
Arthroscopy. 2005 Nov;21(11):1317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.018.
2
Stability results of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2- to 8-year follow-up.腘绳肌重建前交叉韧带术后2至8年随访的稳定性结果。
Arthroscopy. 2005 Feb;21(2):138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.10.017.
3
A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.髌腱骨移植与腘绳肌肌腱移植用于前交叉韧带重建的前瞻性随机对照研究。
使用腘绳肌腱进行双束前交叉韧带重建的结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 May;17(5):456-63. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0707-7. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
Arthroscopy. 2005 Jan;21(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.014.
4
Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts.使用腘绳肌腱移植物对前交叉韧带的前内侧束和后外侧束进行解剖重建。
Arthroscopy. 2004 Dec;20(10):1015-25. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.08.010.
5
Second-look arthroscopy of anterior cruciate ligament grafts with multistranded hamstring tendons.采用多股绳肌腱的前交叉韧带移植物的二次关节镜检查
Arthroscopy. 2004 Mar;20(3):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.031.
6
Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads.前交叉韧带中响应旋转负荷的原位力分布。
J Orthop Res. 2004 Jan;22(1):85-9. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00133-5.
7
Comparison between the cross-sectional area of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts and multistranded hamstring tendon grafts obtained from the same patients.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003 Mar;11(2):81-4. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0349-8. Epub 2003 Feb 19.
8
Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper.前交叉韧带重建术后的膝关节稳定性及移植物功能:11点与10点股骨隧道定位的比较。2002年理查德·奥康纳奖论文。
Arthroscopy. 2003 Mar;19(3):297-304. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50084.
9
Graft fixation with predetermined tension using a new device, the double spike plate.使用一种新装置——双钉板,以预定张力进行移植物固定。
Arthroscopy. 2002 Oct;18(8):908-11. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.35267.
10
Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.解剖学前交叉韧带重建的生物力学分析
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;30(5):660-6. doi: 10.1177/03635465020300050501.