• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

校准紧急程度:儿科急诊科的分诊决策

Calibrating urgency: triage decision-making in a pediatric emergency department.

作者信息

Patel Vimla L, Gutnik Lily A, Karlin Daniel R, Pusic Martin

机构信息

Laboratory of Decision Making and Cognition, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Nov;13(4):503-20. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9062-6. Epub 2007 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10459-007-9062-6
PMID:17364221
Abstract

Triage, the first step in the assessment of emergency department patients, occurs in a highly dynamic environment that functions under constraints of time, physical space, and patient needs that may exceed available resources. Through triage, patients are placed into one of a limited number of categories using a subset of diagnostic information. To facilitate this task and standardize the triage decision process, triage guidelines have been implemented. However, these protocols are interpreted differently by highly experienced (expert) nurses and less experienced (novice) nurses. This study investigates the process of triage; the factors that influence triage decision-making, and how the guidelines are used in the process. Using observations and semi-structured interviews of triage nurses, data was collected in the pediatric emergency department of a large Canadian teaching hospital. Results show that in emergency situations (1) triage decisions were often non-analytic and based on intuition, particularly with increasing expertise, and (2) guidelines were used differently by nurses during the triage process. These results suggest that explicit guideline information becomes internalized and implicitly used in emergency triage practice as nurses gain experience. Implications of these results for nursing education and training, and guideline development for emergency care are discussed.

摘要

分诊是急诊科患者评估的第一步,发生在一个高度动态的环境中,该环境在时间、物理空间以及可能超出可用资源的患者需求的限制下运作。通过分诊,利用一部分诊断信息将患者归入有限的几个类别之一。为便于开展这项工作并使分诊决策过程标准化,已实施了分诊指南。然而,经验丰富的(专家级)护士和经验不足的(新手)护士对这些规程的解读有所不同。本研究调查了分诊过程;影响分诊决策的因素,以及在该过程中如何使用指南。通过对分诊护士进行观察和半结构化访谈,在加拿大一家大型教学医院的儿科急诊科收集了数据。结果显示,在紧急情况下:(1)分诊决策通常是非分析性的且基于直觉,尤其是随着专业知识的增加;(2)护士在分诊过程中对指南的使用方式不同。这些结果表明,随着护士积累经验,明确的指南信息会被内化并在紧急分诊实践中被隐性使用。讨论了这些结果对护理教育与培训以及急诊护理指南制定的影响。

相似文献

1
Calibrating urgency: triage decision-making in a pediatric emergency department.校准紧急程度:儿科急诊科的分诊决策
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Nov;13(4):503-20. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9062-6. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
2
An exploration of accident and emergency nurse experiences of triage decision making in Hong Kong.香港急症室护士分诊决策经验的探索。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2005 Oct;13(4):206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
3
Thinking strategies used by Registered Nurses during emergency department triage.注册护士在急诊科分诊时使用的思维策略。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jan;61(2):163-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04473.x.
4
Deliberate self-harm: emergency department nurses' attitudes, triage and care intentions.蓄意自伤:急诊科护士的态度、分诊及护理意愿
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Sep;16(9):1704-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01555.x. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
5
Explicating nurses' cardiac triage decisions.解读护士的心脏分诊决策。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):50-7. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000317474.50424.4f.
6
Triage nurses' decisions using the National Triage Scale for Australian emergency departments.分诊护士使用澳大利亚急诊科国家分诊量表进行的决策。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2000 Oct;8(4):201-9. doi: 10.1054/aaen.2000.0166.
7
Accuracy of pediatric triage at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.泰国曼谷诗里拉吉医院儿科分诊的准确性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Oct;93(10):1172-6.
8
Do knowledge and experience have specific roles in triage decision-making?知识和经验在分诊决策中是否具有特定作用?
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;14(8):722-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.04.015.
9
Decision-making in A&E by expert nurses.急诊室中专家护士的决策制定。
Nurs Times. 1998;94(41):62-5.
10
What general emergency nurses want to know about mental health patients presenting to their emergency department.普通急诊护士想了解的关于前往其急诊科的心理健康患者的情况。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007 Jan;15(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.09.003. Epub 2007 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of Songklanagarind Pediatric Triage Model in the Emergency Department; a Cross-Sectional Study.宋卡纳加林儿童医院急诊科分诊模型的验证;一项横断面研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 May 20;9(1):e39. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1237. eCollection 2021.
2
Coupling Wearable Devices and Decision Theory in the United States Emergency Department Triage Process: A Narrative Review.美国急诊分诊流程中可穿戴设备与决策理论的结合:叙事性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;17(24):9561. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249561.
3
Exploring the concept and structure of obstetric triage: a qualitative content analysis.
探讨产科分诊的概念和结构:定性内容分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 15;20(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00369-0.
4
Assessing patient safety in a pediatric telemedicine setting: a multi-methods study.评估儿科远程医疗环境中的患者安全:一项多方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1074-7.
5
Responsibility-Evading Performance: The Experiences of Healthcare Staff about Triage in Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Study.逃避责任的表现:医护人员在急诊科分诊方面的经历:一项定性研究
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):379-386. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_217_18.
6
Dynamic patient grouping and prioritization: a new approach to emergency department flow improvement.动态患者分组与优先级确定:一种改善急诊科流程的新方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Jun;19(2):192-205. doi: 10.1007/s10729-014-9311-1. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
7
Suicide risk assessment in Australian emergency departments: assessing clinicians' disposition decisions.澳大利亚急诊科的自杀风险评估:评估临床医生的处置决策。
Psychiatry J. 2014;2014:943574. doi: 10.1155/2014/943574. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
8
Risk assessment in the first fifteen minutes: a prospective cohort study of a simple physiological scoring system in the emergency department.十五分钟内的风险评估:急诊部简单生理评分系统的前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R25. doi: 10.1186/cc9972. Epub 2011 Jan 18.