• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉在哪里?在腹腔镜检查前触诊主动脉是否值得?

Where is the aorta? Is it worth palpating the aorta prior to laparoscopy?

作者信息

Polyzos Dimitrios, Papadopoulos Nikolaos, Chapman Lynne, Papalampros Panos, Varela Vasiliki, Gambadauro Pietro, Magos Adam

机构信息

Minimally Invasive Therapy Unit & Endoscopy Training Centre, University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, Hampstead, London, NW3 2QG, England.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(2):235-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340601090147.

DOI:10.1080/00016340601090147
PMID:17364289
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Injury to major retroperitoneal vessels is the most catastrophic complication of laparoscopy. Knowledge of the site of the aortic bifurcation prior to inserting the umbilical port would be expected to reduce the risk of this type of injury. The aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of identifying the aortic bifurcation by palpation prior to the operation.

METHODS

We studied 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery or laparotomy. After prepping and draping, the operating surgeon felt for the aortic bifurcation to determine its position in relation to the umbilicus. We then related our findings to the height, weight, and body mass index of the patient.

RESULTS

The aorta could not be palpated in 15% of cases, including almost 2/3 of women who were obese (body mass index >30). In the remaining 85% cases, where the aorta was palpable, the bifurcation was above the level of the umbilicus in 30 (35%) cases, at the umbilicus in 45 (53%) cases, and below in 10 (12%) cases. We did not find any significant effect of body mass index, height, or weight on the level of the aortic bifurcation by palpation. No vascular injury occurred in the laparoscopic cases during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The aortic bifurcation is palpable in the majority of women undergoing surgery, including 93% of those with a low or normal body mass index who are at higher risk of vascular injury. We recommend the routine palpation for the aortic bifurcation as a simple means to reduce the risk of injury to a major retroperitoneal vessel.

摘要

背景

腹膜后主要血管损伤是腹腔镜手术最严重的并发症。在插入脐部端口前了解主动脉分叉的位置有望降低此类损伤的风险。本研究的目的是确定术前通过触诊识别主动脉分叉的可行性。

方法

我们研究了100例接受腹腔镜手术或剖腹手术的患者。在进行皮肤准备和铺巾后,手术医生触摸主动脉分叉以确定其相对于脐部的位置。然后我们将研究结果与患者的身高、体重和体重指数相关联。

结果

15%的病例无法触及主动脉,其中包括近三分之二肥胖(体重指数>30)的女性。在其余85%可触及主动脉的病例中,分叉位于脐部水平上方的有30例(35%),位于脐部水平的有45例(53%),位于脐部水平下方的有10例(12%)。我们未发现体重指数、身高或体重对通过触诊确定的主动脉分叉水平有任何显著影响。在研究期间,腹腔镜手术病例中未发生血管损伤。

结论

大多数接受手术的女性可触及主动脉分叉,包括93%体重指数低或正常且血管损伤风险较高的女性。我们建议常规触诊主动脉分叉,作为降低腹膜后主要血管损伤风险的一种简单方法。

相似文献

1
Where is the aorta? Is it worth palpating the aorta prior to laparoscopy?主动脉在哪里?在腹腔镜检查前触诊主动脉是否值得?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(2):235-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340601090147.
2
[The anatomic relationship of the umbilicus to retroperitoneal major vessels].[脐与腹膜后主要血管的解剖关系]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Feb 21;86(7):450-2.
3
The relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation: implications for laparoscopic technique.
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;80(1):48-51.
4
Aortic injury during diagnostic pediatric laparoscopy.小儿诊断性腹腔镜检查期间的主动脉损伤
Surg Endosc. 2001 May;15(5):519. doi: 10.1007/s004640040012. Epub 2001 Mar 13.
5
Laparoscopic appraisal of the anatomic relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation.腹腔镜评估脐与主动脉分叉的解剖关系。
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 May;5(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80079-0.
6
Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy.妇科腹腔镜检查期间的主要血管损伤
J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Nov;185(5):461-5.
7
Supraumbilical primary trocar insertion for laparoscopic access: the relationship between points of entry and retroperitoneal vital vasculature by imaging.腹腔镜入路脐上主套管穿刺:通过影像学观察穿刺点与腹膜后重要血管的关系
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):506.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.060. Epub 2015 May 29.
8
The relationship between the umbilicus and the aortic bifurcation in Turkish women: implications for laparoscopic entry.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;296(6):1175-1180. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4552-0. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
9
[Injuries of the large vessels caused by laparoscopy].[腹腔镜检查引起的大血管损伤]
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1987;109(10):673-8.
10
Positional anatomy of vessels that may be damaged at laparoscopy: new access criteria based on CT and ultrasonography to avoid vascular injury.腹腔镜检查时可能受损血管的局部解剖:基于CT和超声检查的新入路标准以避免血管损伤。
J Endourol. 2006 Jul;20(7):498-503. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.498.

引用本文的文献

1
Trocar Injuries in Laparoscopy: Techniques, Tools, and Means for Prevention. A Systematic Review of the Literature.腹腔镜手术中的套管针损伤:技术、工具及预防方法。文献系统综述
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2331-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3527-9.
2
Open Versus Closed Laparoscopy: Yet an Unresolved Controversy.开放式腹腔镜手术与闭合式腹腔镜手术:仍是一个未解决的争议。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Feb;10(2):QC04-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18049.7252. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
3
Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.
腹腔镜端口进入两种方法的比较:技术视角
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012;2012:305428. doi: 10.1155/2012/305428. Epub 2012 Jun 13.