• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用辅助和替代沟通方式的个体的长期结果:第二部分——交流互动

Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part II--communicative interaction.

作者信息

Lund Shelley K, Light Janice

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.

出版信息

Augment Altern Commun. 2007 Mar;23(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/07434610600720442.

DOI:10.1080/07434610600720442
PMID:17364484
Abstract

This study evaluated the communicative interaction skills of seven young men (ages 19-23 years) who had used AAC systems for at least 15 years. Turn-taking patterns, use of communicative functions, and linguistic complexity were analyzed. Current performance was compared to the participants' skills when they were preschoolers and participated in another study of interaction skills (Light, 1985; Light, Collier, & Parnes, 1985a,b,c). Results indicated that the turn distribution between partners was more equitable than it had been when the participants were preschoolers; five of the participants approached reciprocity in turn taking during at least two of the interactions observed. During interactions with their caregivers, the participants fulfilled most of their obligatory turns and more than half of their non-obligatory turns. The communicative functions used most frequently by the participants were confirmations/denials and provisions of information. Three of the participants demonstrated the ability to use complete and complex syntax and committed few errors in grammar, while the other four participants demonstrated many syntactic errors. The results are discussed with implications for clinical practice and directions for future research.

摘要

本研究评估了7名至少使用辅助沟通系统15年的年轻男性(年龄在19至23岁之间)的沟通互动技能。分析了轮流模式、沟通功能的使用情况以及语言复杂性。将当前的表现与参与者在学龄前儿童时期参与另一项互动技能研究时的技能进行了比较(莱特,1985年;莱特、科利尔和帕内斯,1985年a、b、c)。结果表明,与参与者学龄前儿童时期相比,伙伴之间的轮流分布更加公平;在观察到的至少两次互动中,有5名参与者在轮流方面接近对等。在与照顾者的互动中,参与者完成了大部分的必要轮流和超过一半的非必要轮流。参与者最常使用的沟通功能是确认/否认和提供信息。其中3名参与者表现出使用完整和复杂句法的能力,语法错误很少,而其他4名参与者则出现了许多句法错误。讨论了研究结果对临床实践的启示以及未来研究的方向。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part II--communicative interaction.使用辅助和替代沟通方式的个体的长期结果:第二部分——交流互动
Augment Altern Commun. 2007 Mar;23(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/07434610600720442.
2
Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part I--what is a "good" outcome?使用辅助和替代沟通方式的个体的长期结果:第一部分——什么是“良好”结果?
Augment Altern Commun. 2006 Dec;22(4):284-99. doi: 10.1080/07434610600718693.
3
Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III--contributing factors.使用辅助沟通的个体的长期结果:第三部分——影响因素。
Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23(4):323-35. doi: 10.1080/02656730701189123.
4
'I've got something to say': interaction in a focus group of adults with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs.“我有话要说”:脑瘫及复杂沟通需求成年人群焦点小组中的互动
Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24(2):110-22. doi: 10.1080/07434610701830579.
5
The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: research review and implications for effective practice.使用辅助沟通系统者的形态学和句法:研究综述及对有效实践的启示
Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24(2):123-38. doi: 10.1080/07434610701830587.
6
The loneliness experiences of young adults with cerebral palsy who use alternative and augmentative communication.使用替代和增强沟通的脑瘫青年成年人的孤独感体验。
Augment Altern Commun. 2009;25(3):154-64. doi: 10.1080/07434610903036785.
7
The AAC Mentor Project: web-based instruction in sociorelational skills and collaborative problem solving for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication.AAC 指导项目:针对使用辅助和替代沟通方式的成年人的社会关系技能和协作问题解决的网络教学。
Augment Altern Commun. 2007 Mar;23(1):56-75. doi: 10.1080/07434610600924499.
8
Confirming and denying in co-construction processes: a case study of an adult with cerebral palsy and two familiar partners.在共同构建过程中的确认和否定:一个脑瘫成人和两个熟悉伙伴的案例研究。
Augment Altern Commun. 2013 Sep;29(3):259-71. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2013.813968.
9
Mother-child interaction revisited: communication with non-speaking physically disabled children.重新审视母婴互动:与无语言能力的身体残疾儿童的交流
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999 Oct-Dec;34(4):391-416. doi: 10.1080/136828299247351.
10
Post-school quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC.使用辅助沟通系统的发育障碍个体的离校后生活质量
Augment Altern Commun. 2006 Jun;22(2):134-47. doi: 10.1080/07434610500395493.

引用本文的文献

1
Transition to Adulthood for Individuals With Complex Communication Needs: A Scoping Review.复杂沟通需求个体的成年过渡期:范围综述。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2025 Jan;45(1):66-84. doi: 10.1177/15394492241271162. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
2
Sensitivity to Communication Partners During Naturalistic AAC Conversations in Cantonese Chinese.粤语自然主义辅助沟通交流中对沟通伙伴的敏感性
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 18;12:686657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686657. eCollection 2021.
3
A Technology-Assisted Language Intervention for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
一项针对聋或重听儿童的技术辅助语言干预:一项随机临床试验。
Pediatrics. 2021 Feb;147(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-025734. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
Growing up with AAC in the digital age: a longitudinal profile of communication across contexts from toddler to teen.在数字时代伴随 AAC 成长:从幼儿到青少年跨情境的沟通纵向特征分析。
Augment Altern Commun. 2020 Jun;36(2):128-141. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2020.1782988. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
5
Classification of activity engagement in individuals with severe physical disabilities using signals of the peripheral nervous system.利用外周神经系统信号对严重身体残疾个体的活动参与进行分类。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030373. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
6
Speech and language therapy to improve the communication skills of children with cerebral palsy.言语和语言治疗以提高脑瘫患儿的沟通能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD003466. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003466.pub2.