Byarugaba D K, Minga U M, Gwakisa P S, Katunguka-Rwakishaya E, Bisgaard M, Olsen J E
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Makerere University. P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Avian Pathol. 2007 Feb;36(1):35-42. doi: 10.1080/03079450601102947.
Avibacterium paragallinarum isolates from Uganda were characterized for their virulence by comparison of their pathogenicity and their resistance to serum. Pathogenicity was evaluated using commercial Hisex Brown layer chickens, local indigenous chickens, local turkeys and local guineafowls inoculated with 108 colony-forming units of Av. paragallinarum and comparing their overall mean disease scores over a period of 20 days. Persistence of the bacteria in the host and water was also investigated for a 60-day period by culture and polymerase chain reaction as well as use of sentinel chickens. Serum resistance was measured by comparison of the growth kinetics and survival indices at 3 and 6 h. There was no difference in the virulence of the isolates. Commercial layer chickens and local indigenous chickens were equally susceptible to challenge, while turkeys and guineafowls only showed transient mild signs and did not transmit infection. Turkeys and guineafowls did not acquire the infection when placed in contact with infected chickens. The isolates were resistant in normal chicken serum at both 3 and 6 h of incubation but were resistant at 3 h and sensitive at 6 h in turkey and guineafowl sera. The resistance of the isolates to serum correlated with their pathogenicity in the different hosts. No carrier status was demonstrated in this study using polymerase chain reaction and culture. The present study demonstrates that Ugandan Av. paragallinarum isolates are pathogenic to chickens with only transient signs in turkeys and guineafowls, and that serum resistance could be a subject for further investigation as a predictor of virulence of these bacteria. The role of turkeys and guineafowls in transmission of Av. paragallinarum was not demonstrated in the present investigation.
通过比较乌干达分离出的副鸡禽杆菌菌株的致病性和对血清的抗性,对其毒力进行了表征。使用接种了10⁸个副鸡禽杆菌菌落形成单位的商业海赛克斯褐壳蛋鸡、当地土鸡、当地火鸡和当地珍珠鸡来评估致病性,并在20天内比较它们的总体平均疾病评分。还通过培养、聚合酶链反应以及使用哨兵鸡,对细菌在宿主和水中持续存在60天的情况进行了研究。通过比较3小时和6小时的生长动力学和存活指数来测量血清抗性。分离菌株的毒力没有差异。商业蛋鸡和当地土鸡对攻击同样敏感,而火鸡和珍珠鸡仅表现出短暂的轻微症状,且不传播感染。将火鸡和珍珠鸡与受感染的鸡接触时,它们不会感染。分离菌株在3小时和6小时的孵育中对正常鸡血清有抗性,但在火鸡和珍珠鸡血清中3小时时有抗性,6小时时敏感。分离菌株对血清的抗性与它们在不同宿主中的致病性相关。在本研究中,使用聚合酶链反应和培养未证明有携带状态。本研究表明,乌干达的副鸡禽杆菌分离株对鸡具有致病性,对火鸡和珍珠鸡仅产生短暂症状,并且血清抗性作为这些细菌毒力的预测指标可能值得进一步研究。在本研究中未证明火鸡和珍珠鸡在副鸡禽杆菌传播中的作用。