Donaldson Morag L, Reid Jennifer, Murray Claire
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007 Mar-Apr;42(2):155-86. doi: 10.1080/13682820600822281.
The production of causal sentences (e.g. The house went on fire because the girl was playing with matches) is a key component of the ability to produce explanations, which in turn is an important aspect of children's developing discourse skills. While informal observations by professionals suggest that children with language impairments often have difficulties in producing (and comprehending) causal sentences, there is a dearth of systematic research evidence on the scope and characteristics of such difficulties.
The study reported herein aimed to establish the scope and characteristics of the difficulties that children with language impairments have with causal sentence production. In particular, it investigated whether they have difficulties with (1) producing causal connectives (because and so), (2) producing semantically appropriate causal sentences, and (3) coordinating the production of more than one clause.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: The performance of 5-7-year-old children with language impairments (the LI group, n = 30) was compared with that of typically developing chronological age peers (the CA group, n = 30) on four elicited production tasks designed to encourage children to talk about pictures of causally related events. The tasks required the children to answer causal questions, to complete and imitate causal sentences, and to produce full causal sentences.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Although the groups did not differ in the overall frequency with which they used causal connectives, the LI group produced fewer causal connectives than the CA group on tasks involving higher processing demands, as well as producing a lower percentage of semantically appropriate responses on most tasks. The LI group found imitating causal sentences more difficult than answering causal questions and completing causal sentences, whereas the CA group showed a similar level of performance across these three tasks.
Although 5-7-year-old children with language impairments have causal expressions in their repertoire, they have marked and extensive problems in using these expressions appropriately and in producing full causal sentences even when these are modelled for them. Given the educational importance of explanation, there is a clear need for interventions to target both the semantic appropriateness of causal sentence production and the frequency of use of causal connectives, especially in contexts where children have to cope with the additional processing demands associated with producing two-clause sentences and/or with producing causal sentences autonomously.
因果句的生成(例如:房子着火了,因为女孩在玩火柴)是解释能力的关键组成部分,而解释能力又是儿童话语技能发展的一个重要方面。虽然专业人士的非正式观察表明,语言障碍儿童在生成(和理解)因果句方面往往存在困难,但关于此类困难的范围和特征,缺乏系统的研究证据。
本文所报告的研究旨在确定语言障碍儿童在因果句生成方面的困难范围和特征。具体而言,研究调查了他们是否在以下方面存在困难:(1)生成因果连接词(因为和所以);(2)生成语义恰当的因果句;(3)协调多个子句的生成。
将30名5至7岁的语言障碍儿童(LI组)的表现与30名年龄匹配的发育正常儿童(CA组)在四项诱发生成任务中的表现进行比较,这些任务旨在鼓励儿童谈论因果相关事件的图片。任务要求儿童回答因果问题、完成并模仿因果句以及生成完整的因果句。
尽管两组在使用因果连接词的总体频率上没有差异,但在处理要求较高的任务中,LI组使用的因果连接词比CA组少,并且在大多数任务中,语义恰当反应的百分比也较低。LI组发现模仿因果句比回答因果问题和完成因果句更困难,而CA组在这三项任务中的表现水平相似。
虽然5至7岁的语言障碍儿童有因果表达能力,但他们在恰当地使用这些表达以及生成完整因果句方面存在显著且广泛的问题,即使为他们提供了范例。鉴于解释在教育中的重要性,显然需要进行干预,以针对因果句生成的语义恰当性和因果连接词的使用频率,特别是在儿童必须应对与生成双子句句子和/或自主生成因果句相关的额外处理要求的情况下。