Suppr超能文献

运动技能习得与保持中建模与意象的比较。

A comparison of modelling and imagery in the acquisition and retention of motor skills.

作者信息

Ram Nilam, Riggs S M, Skaling S, Landers D M, McCullagh P

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2007 Mar;25(5):587-97. doi: 10.1080/02640410600947132.

Abstract

Although many researchers have examined the effects of imagery and/or modelling interventions, it is unclear which of the two interventions is more effective. In two experiments, novice learners assessed over multiple trials of a free weight squat lifting or a stabilometer balancing task were given modelling, imagery, a combination of modelling and imagery, or control interventions. Group differences indicated, in general, that groups receiving modelling (modelling, combination) evidenced a more appropriate form than groups that did not receive modelling (imagery, control). When apparent, these differences were already in place after the first of several interventions. Practical implications are that even a single bout of modelling can have immediate beneficial effects on movement form (Experiments 1 and 2) and outcome (Experiment 1).

摘要

尽管许多研究人员已经考察了表象和/或示范干预的效果,但尚不清楚这两种干预方式中哪种更有效。在两项实验中,对新手学习者进行多次自由重量深蹲或稳定仪平衡任务测试时,分别给予他们示范、表象、示范与表象相结合的干预方式,或进行对照干预。总体而言,组间差异表明,接受示范干预的组(示范组、示范与表象结合组)比未接受示范干预的组(表象组、对照组)表现出更合适的动作形式。当存在明显差异时,这些差异在几次干预中的第一次之后就已经出现了。实际意义在于,即使单次示范也能对动作形式(实验1和实验2)和结果(实验1)产生即时的有益影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验