Gonçalves Alessandra Fernandes, de Oliveira Rocha Rachel, Oliveira Marta Dutra Machado, Rodrigues Celia Regina Martins Delgado
Department of Orthodontic and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes 2227, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil.
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007;5(1):33-7.
The aim of this crossover study was to compare the efficacy of conventional and end-tufted toothbrushes and two methods of plaque removal on partially erupted occlusal surfaces in schoolchildren.
Thirty-seven subjects, aged 5-7 years, with at least one partially erupted lower permanent first molar, were randomly divided into three groups. Occlusal plaque (baseline) was scored using a disclosing solution applied to the occlusal surface of an erupting molar. Subjects were instructed to use a conventional toothbrush with horizontal scrubbing (conventional group); a conventional toothbrush with transverse technique (modified group); or an end-tufted toothbrush (end-tufted group). Subjects returned after a one-week washout period and brushed with the alternate toothbrush or technique. Final plaque condition was evaluated again using the same scoring as at baseline. Occlusal plaque reduction (baseline to final) percentiles were compared using paired t-test.
No statistically significant difference was found among transverse and end-tufted techniques (modified and end-tufted groups respectively) (p > 0.05). The conventional group was less effective on occlusal plaque removal in erupting first molars than the other groups (p < 0.05).
The conventional toothbrushing technique was not satisfactory compared with other tested techniques on occlusal plaque removal. Moreover, the use of a conventional toothbrush with a modified technique was very effective on erupting first permanent molars without any additional costly device.
本交叉研究旨在比较传统牙刷和末端刷毛牙刷对学童部分萌出的咬合面菌斑清除效果,以及两种菌斑清除方法的效果。
37名年龄在5至7岁、至少有一颗部分萌出的下颌第一恒磨牙的受试者被随机分为三组。使用涂抹在萌出磨牙咬合面上的显影液对咬合面菌斑(基线)进行评分。受试者被指示使用传统牙刷进行水平刷牙(传统组);使用传统牙刷采用横向刷牙法(改良组);或使用末端刷毛牙刷(末端刷毛组)。在为期一周的洗脱期后,受试者返回,改用另一种牙刷或刷牙方法刷牙。使用与基线相同的评分方法再次评估最终的菌斑状况。使用配对t检验比较咬合面菌斑减少率(从基线到最终)的百分位数。
横向刷牙法和末端刷毛刷牙法(分别为改良组和末端刷毛组)之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。传统组在清除萌出第一磨牙咬合面菌斑方面比其他组效果差(p < 0.05)。
与其他测试方法相比,传统刷牙方法在清除咬合面菌斑方面并不令人满意。此外,使用采用改良刷牙法的传统牙刷对萌出的第一恒磨牙非常有效,无需任何额外的昂贵设备。