Suppr超能文献

毛发中的异质性:同一个体毛发与血液之间的差异仍是一个有争议的问题。

Heteroplasmy in hair: differences among hair and blood from the same individuals are still a matter of debate.

作者信息

Paneto Greiciane G, Martins Joyce A, Longo Larissa V G, Pereira Gabriella A, Freschi Adriana, Alvarenga Vera L S, Chen Bety, Oliveira Rogério N, Hirata Mário H, Cicarelli Regina M B

机构信息

UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Laboratório de Investigação de Paternidade, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú, Km 1, Campus, 14801-902 Araraquara, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Dec 20;173(2-3):117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.011. Epub 2007 Mar 26.

Abstract

The analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a useful tool in forensic cases when sample contents too little or degraded nuclear DNA to genotype by autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) loci, but it is especially useful when the only forensic evidence is a hair shaft. Several authors have related differences in mtDNA from different tissues within the same individual, with high frequency of heteroplasmic variants in hair, as also in some other tissues. Is still a matter of debate how the differences influence the interpretation forensic protocols. One difference between two samples supposed to be originated from the same individual are related to an inconclusive result, but depending on the tissue and the position of the difference it should have a different interpretation, based on mutation-rate heterogeneity of mtDNA. In order to investigate it differences in the mtDNA control region from hair shafts and blood in our population, sequences from the hypervariable regions 1 and 2 (HV1 and HV2) from 100 Brazilian unrelated individuals were compared. The frequency of point heteroplasmy observed in hair was 10.5% by sequencing. Our study confirms the results related by other authors that concluded that small differences within tissues should be interpreted with caution especially when analyzing hair samples.

摘要

当样本中核DNA含量过少或降解以至于无法通过常染色体短串联重复序列(STR)位点进行基因分型时,线粒体DNA(mtDNA)分析在法医案件中是一种有用的工具,而当唯一的法医证据是毛发时,它尤其有用。几位作者已经阐述了同一个体内不同组织的mtDNA存在差异,毛发以及其他一些组织中异质性变异的频率较高。这些差异如何影响法医鉴定方案的解读仍是一个有争议的问题。两个假定来自同一个体的样本之间的一个差异与结果不确定有关,但根据组织和差异的位置,基于mtDNA的突变率异质性,应该有不同的解读。为了研究我们人群中毛发和血液的mtDNA控制区域的差异,比较了100名巴西无关个体的高变区1和高变区2(HV1和HV2)的序列。通过测序观察到毛发中位点异质性的频率为10.5%。我们的研究证实了其他作者的结果,即组织内的微小差异应谨慎解读,尤其是在分析毛发样本时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验