Suppr超能文献

为何要投资开展一项全国性的中风公共卫生项目?以澳大利亚数据为例估算潜在益处及成本影响。

Why invest in a national public health program for stroke? An example using Australian data to estimate the potential benefits and cost implications.

作者信息

Cadilhac Dominique A, Carter Robert C, Thrift Amanda G, Dewey Helen M

机构信息

National Stroke Research Institute, Heidelberg Heights, Vic. 3081, Australia.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2007 Oct;83(2-3):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Mar 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Stroke is the world's second leading cause of death in people aged over 60 years. Approximately 50,000 strokes occur annually in Australia with numbers predicted to increase by about one third over 10-years. Our objectives were to assess the economic implications of a public health program for stroke by: (1) predicting what potential health-gains and cost-offsets could be achieved; and (2) determining the net level of annual investment that would offer value-for-money.

METHODS

Lifetime costs and outcomes were calculated for additional cases that would benefit if 'current practice' was feasibly improved, estimated for one indicative year using: (i) local epidemiological data, coverage rates and costs; and (ii) pooled effect sizes from systematic reviews.

INTERVENTIONS

blood pressure lowering; warfarin for atrial fibrillation; increased access to stroke units; intravenous thrombolysis and aspirin for ischemic events; and carotid endarterectomy. Value-for-money threshold: AUD$30,000/DALY recovered.

RESULTS

Improved, prevention and management could prevent about 27,000 (38%) strokes in 2015. In present terms (2004), about 85,000 DALYs and AUD$1.06 billion in lifetime cost-offsets could be recovered. The net level of annual warranted investment was AUD$3.63 billion.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary prevention, in particular blood pressure lowering, was most effective. A public health program for stroke is warranted.

摘要

目标

中风是60岁以上人群中全球第二大死因。澳大利亚每年约有5万例中风发生,预计10年内这一数字将增加约三分之一。我们的目标是通过以下方式评估一项中风公共卫生项目的经济影响:(1)预测可实现的潜在健康收益和成本抵消;(2)确定能提供性价比的年度投资净水平。

方法

计算如果“当前做法”得到切实改善将会受益的新增病例的终生成本和结果,使用以下数据对一个指示性年份进行估算:(i)当地流行病学数据、覆盖率和成本;(ii)系统评价中的合并效应量。

干预措施

降低血压;使用华法林治疗房颤;增加进入中风单元的机会;对缺血性事件使用静脉溶栓和阿司匹林;以及颈动脉内膜切除术。性价比阈值:每挽回一个伤残调整生命年(DALY)30,000澳元。

结果

改善预防和管理措施在2015年可预防约27,000例(38%)中风。按当前(2004年)计算,可挽回约85,000个伤残调整生命年,终生成本抵消10.6亿澳元。年度合理投资净水平为36.3亿澳元。

结论

一级预防,尤其是降低血压,最为有效。一项中风公共卫生项目是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验