Segura Sonia, Iranzo Pilar, Martínez-de Pablo Isabel, Mascaró José Manuel, Alsina Mercè, Herrero Josep, Herrero Carmen
Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Jun;56(6):960-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.06.029. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
The mainstay of therapy of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases has been prolonged high-dose systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. Recently, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been employed in selected cases, with excellent results in most of them.
We sought to evaluate the outcome of the use of IVIg in patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases refractory to conventional therapy or with contraindications for it.
We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical response to monthly cycles of IVIg in 19 patients affected with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases: 10 patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV), 2 with pemphigus foliaceus (PF), 4 with mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), 2 with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and one with linear IgA bullous dermatosis.
Four (21%) of 19 cases presented a complete response (2 PV, 1 MMP and 1 epidermolysis bullosa acquisita). Five (26%) patients did not respond to the treatment (3 PV, 1 PF, 1 MMP). Ten patients (53%) had a partial response.
This was a retrospective noncontrolled study with a heterogeneous group of patients.
The effectiveness of IVIg was inferior to that previously reported. This difference could be attributed to the preparations employed, the different severity of the disease, or individual responses in each patient dependent on Fc receptor gamma polymorphisms.
自身免疫性黏膜皮肤水疱病的主要治疗方法一直是长期使用大剂量全身性皮质类固醇和免疫抑制剂。最近,大剂量静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)已被用于部分病例,大多数病例效果良好。
我们试图评估IVIg用于对传统治疗难治或有传统治疗禁忌证的自身免疫性黏膜皮肤水疱病患者的疗效。
我们对19例自身免疫性黏膜皮肤水疱病患者每月进行一次IVIg治疗的临床反应进行了回顾性分析,其中寻常型天疱疮(PV)10例、落叶型天疱疮(PF)2例、黏膜类天疱疮(MMP)4例、获得性大疱性表皮松解症2例、线状IgA大疱性皮病1例。
19例中有4例(21%)完全缓解(2例PV、1例MMP和1例获得性大疱性表皮松解症)。5例(26%)患者治疗无效(3例PV、1例PF、1例MMP)。10例患者(53%)部分缓解。
这是一项回顾性非对照研究,患者群体异质性较大。
IVIg的有效性低于先前报道。这种差异可能归因于所使用的制剂、疾病的不同严重程度或每位患者取决于Fc受体γ多态性的个体反应。