Sawada Shoji
Nagoya University, Japan.
Med Confl Surviv. 2007 Jan-Mar;23(1):58-74. doi: 10.1080/13623690601084617.
The criteria certifying atomic bomb disease adopted by the Japanese government are very different from the actual state of the survivors. The criteria are based on epidemiological research by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, the successor to the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC). The ABCC studied only the effects of primary radiation from the atomic bombing on the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and ignored the damage from residual radiation. Analysis of the incidence of acute radiation disease, the rate of chromosomal aberrations, and the relative risks of chronic disease among the survivors, shows that the effects of residual radiation from fallout exceeds that of primary radiation in the area more than 1.5-1.7 km distant from the hypocentre of the Hiroshima bombing. The effects of internal exposure due to intake of tiny radioactive particles are more severe than those of external exposure, explaining the difference between the official criteria and the actual state of the survivors.
日本政府所采用的认证原子弹病的标准与幸存者的实际状况大不相同。这些标准基于原爆点伤亡委员会(ABCC)的后续机构——辐射影响研究基金会的流行病学研究。ABCC仅研究了原子弹爆炸产生的初始辐射对广岛和长崎幸存者的影响,而忽略了残余辐射造成的损害。对幸存者中急性辐射病的发病率、染色体畸变率以及慢性病的相对风险进行分析后发现,在距离广岛爆炸中心1.5 - 1.7公里以上的区域,沉降物产生的残余辐射的影响超过了初始辐射。因摄入微小放射性颗粒导致的内照射影响比外照射更为严重,这就解释了官方标准与幸存者实际状况之间的差异。