Suppr超能文献

内科病房与重症监护病房住院患者的机械通气——一项观察性比较研究。

Mechanical ventilation of patients hospitalized in medical wards vs the intensive care unit--an observational, comparative study.

作者信息

Hersch Moshe, Sonnenblick Moshe, Karlic Alexander, Einav Sharon, Sprung Charles L, Izbicki Gabriel

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2007 Mar;22(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.06.004. Epub 2007 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In some hospitals, patients are mechanically ventilated on the wards in addition to the intensive care unit (ICU) because of the shortage of ICU beds.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the outcome and ventilatory management of medical patients mechanically ventilated on the medical wards and in the ICU.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, observational, noninterventional study over a 6-month period.

SETTING

The study was conducted in internal medicine wards and the ICU of a 500-bed community university-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

Ninety-nine mechanically ventilated medical patients in the ICU or on the medical wards because of shortage of ICU beds were included in the study.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the patients ventilated in the ICU (group 1) and in the medical wards (group 2) were collected. Thirty-four patients were ventilated in the ICU and 65 in the wards during the study period. In-hospital survival rate in group 1 was 38% vs 20% in group 2 (P < .05). The Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score in group 1 was 24 +/- 7 vs 27 +/- 7 in group 2 (P < .05). Other prognostic factors were similar. The age of the survivors in the 2 groups was similar: 57 +/- 25 years in group 1 vs 69 +/- 13 years in group 2 (P = NS). Mean number of ventilatory changes in group 1 was 7.5 +/- 1.4 per day per patient, whereas it was 1.3 +/- 1.0 in group 2 (P < .001). The number of arterial blood gas analyses in group 1 was 7.7 +/- 1.2 per day per patient compared with 2.3 +/- 1.3 in group 2 (P < .001). Twenty percent (20%) of the patients in group 1 had endotracheal tube-related inadvertent events compared with 62% of the patients in group 2 (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in medical patients requiring mechanical ventilation, there is a higher in-hospital survival rate in ICU-ventilated patients as compared with ventilated patients managed on the medical wards. In addition, ICU provides a better monitoring associated with less endotracheal tube-related complications and more active ventilatory management.

摘要

背景

在一些医院,由于重症监护病房(ICU)床位短缺,患者除了在ICU接受机械通气外,还在病房接受机械通气。

目的

本研究旨在比较在普通内科病房和ICU接受机械通气的内科患者的治疗结果和通气管理情况。

设计

这是一项为期6个月的前瞻性观察性非干预性研究。

地点

研究在一家拥有500张床位的社区大学附属医院的内科病房和ICU进行。

患者

本研究纳入了99名因ICU床位短缺而在ICU或内科病房接受机械通气的内科患者。

结果

收集了在ICU(第1组)和内科病房(第2组)接受通气治疗的患者的基线特征。研究期间,34名患者在ICU接受通气治疗,65名患者在病房接受通气治疗。第1组的院内生存率为38%,而第2组为20%(P < 0.05)。第1组的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分(APACHE)II评分为24±7,第2组为27±7(P < 0.05)。其他预后因素相似。两组幸存者的年龄相似:第1组为57±25岁,第2组为69±13岁(P = 无统计学意义)。第1组患者每天每例的平均通气调整次数为7.5±1.4次,而第2组为1.3±1.0次(P < 0.001)。第1组患者每天每例的动脉血气分析次数为7.7±1.2次,而第2组为2.3±1.3次(P < 0.001)。第1组20%的患者发生了与气管插管相关的意外事件,而第2组为62%(P < 0.05)。

结论

我们得出结论,在内科需要机械通气的患者中,与在内科病房接受通气治疗的患者相比,在ICU接受通气治疗的患者院内生存率更高。此外,ICU能提供更好的监测,气管插管相关并发症更少,通气管理更积极。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验