Spies C, Kavinsky C J, Schräder R
Section of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Minerva Med. 2007 Feb;98(1):25-36.
Our objective is to review the epidemiology and proposed pathophysiology of migraine headache and its association with patent foramen ovale (PFO). We further elucidate the technical aspects of PFO closure and its possible impact on migraine headache. Upon reviewing English-language publications listed in MEDLINE relating to migraine headache, PFO; and transcatheter closure of PFO, we selected case series, retrospective and prospective studies relevant to the topic. PFO closure is being performed in annually increasing numbers worldwide for a variety of indications. The percutaneous technique of PFO closure has been shown to be safe and effective in multiple case series. Further, primarily retrospective case-control studies demonstrate a link between PFO closure and improvement of migraine headache. Few prospective data confirm the initial
However, the only randomized, controlled trial finished to date analyzing the effect of PFO closure on migraine failed to reach its primary outcome of resolution of migraine following the intervention. The evidence of a benefit on migraine headache following PFO closure is not convincing, but certainly intriguing. With currently ongoing trials, more information related to this topic can be expected. In the meantime, the question whether we should close PFOs in patients with migraine headaches cannot be answered.
我们的目的是回顾偏头痛的流行病学、提出的病理生理学及其与卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的关联。我们进一步阐明PFO封堵的技术方面及其对偏头痛可能产生的影响。在查阅MEDLINE中列出的与偏头痛、PFO以及PFO经导管封堵相关的英文出版物后,我们选择了与该主题相关的病例系列、回顾性和前瞻性研究。全球范围内,由于各种适应症,每年进行PFO封堵的数量在不断增加。在多个病例系列中,PFO封堵的经皮技术已被证明是安全有效的。此外,主要是回顾性病例对照研究表明PFO封堵与偏头痛改善之间存在联系。很少有前瞻性数据证实最初的……
然而,迄今为止完成的唯一一项分析PFO封堵对偏头痛影响的随机对照试验未能达到干预后偏头痛缓解的主要结局。PFO封堵后对偏头痛有益的证据并不令人信服,但确实引人关注。随着目前正在进行的试验,预计会有更多关于该主题的信息。与此同时,对于偏头痛患者是否应该封堵PFO这个问题无法给出答案。