Hofmann Andreas, Netzel Jeanette, van Smaalen Sander
Laboratory of Crystallography, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Acta Crystallogr B. 2007 Apr;63(Pt 2):285-95. doi: 10.1107/S0108768106052153. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
An accurate charge density study of trialanine is presented with the maximum entropy method (MEM), on the basis of the same reflection data as was used for a multipole refinement [Rödel et al. (2006). Org. Biomol. Chem. 4, 475-481]. With the MEM, the optimum fit to the data is found to correspond to a final value of chi(2) which is less than its statistical expectation value N(Ref), where N(Ref) is the number of reflections. A refinement strategy is presented that determines the optimal goal for chi(2). It is shown that the MEM and the multipole method are on a par with regard to the reproduction of atomic charges and volumes, general topological features and trends in the charge density in the bond critical points (BCPs). Regarding the values of the charge densities in the BCPs, agreement between quantum chemical calculations, the multipole method and MEM is good, but not perfect. In the case of the Laplacians, the coincidence is not as good and especially the Laplacians of the C-O bonds differ strongly. One of the reasons for the observed differences in the topological parameters in the BCPs is the fact that MEM densities still include the effects of thermal motion, whereas multipole densities are free from the effects of thermal motion. Hydrogen bonds are more convincingly reproduced by the MEM than by multipole models.
基于与多极精修[勒德尔等人(2006年)。《有机生物分子化学》4,475 - 481]所用相同的反射数据,采用最大熵方法(MEM)对三丙氨酸进行了精确的电荷密度研究。利用MEM发现,对数据的最佳拟合对应于卡方(χ²)的最终值,该值小于其统计期望值N(Ref),其中N(Ref)是反射的数量。提出了一种确定χ²最佳目标的精修策略。结果表明,在原子电荷和体积的再现、一般拓扑特征以及键临界点(BCP)处电荷密度的趋势方面,MEM和多极方法相当。关于BCP处电荷密度的值,量子化学计算、多极方法和MEM之间的一致性良好,但并不完美。对于拉普拉斯算子,一致性没那么好,尤其是C - O键的拉普拉斯算子差异很大。在BCP处观察到的拓扑参数差异的一个原因是,MEM密度仍然包含热运动的影响,而多极密度不受热运动的影响。与多极模型相比,MEM能更令人信服地再现氢键。