Mousa Shaaban A, Bopaiah Cheppudira P, Richter Jan F, Yamdeu Reine S, Schäfer Michael
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 Dec;32(12):2530-42. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301393. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
There is conflicting evidence on the antinociceptive effects of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) along the neuraxis of pain transmission and the responsible anatomical sites of CRF's action at the level of the brain, spinal cord and periphery. In an animal model of tonic pain, that is, Freunds complete adjuvant (FCA) hindpaw inflammation, we systematically investigated CRF's ability to modulate inflammatory pain at those three levels of pain transmission by algesiometry following the intracerebroventricular, intrathecal, and intraplantar application of low, systemically inactive doses of CRF. At each level, CRF elicits potent antinociceptive effects, which are dose dependent and antagonized by local, but not systemic CRF receptor antagonist alpha-helical CRF indicating CRF receptor specificity. Consistently, we have identified by immunohistochemistry multiple brain areas, inhibitory interneurons within the dorsal horn of the spinal cord as well as immune cells within subcutaneous tissue--but not peripheral sensory neurons--that coexpress both CRF receptors and opioid peptides. In line with these anatomical findings, local administration of CRF together with the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone dose-dependently reversed CRF's antinociceptive effects at each of these three levels of pain transmission. Therefore, local application of low, systemically inactive doses of CRF at the level of the brain, spinal cord and periphery inhibits tonic inflammatory pain most likely through an activation of CRF receptors on cells that coexpress opioid peptides which results in opioid-mediated pain inhibition. Future studies have to delineate whether endogenous CRF at these three levels contributes to the body's response to cope with the stressful stimulus pain in an opioid-mediated manner.
关于促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子(CRF)在疼痛传递神经轴上的抗伤害感受作用以及CRF在脑、脊髓和外周水平发挥作用的相关解剖部位,存在相互矛盾的证据。在一种持续性疼痛的动物模型中,即弗氏完全佐剂(FCA)诱导的后爪炎症模型中,我们通过脑室内、鞘内和足底内注射低剂量、全身无活性的CRF,然后采用痛觉测定法,系统地研究了CRF在疼痛传递的这三个水平上调节炎性疼痛的能力。在每个水平上,CRF均能引发强效的抗伤害感受作用,这种作用呈剂量依赖性,并且可被局部而非全身的CRF受体拮抗剂α-螺旋CRF所拮抗,这表明CRF受体具有特异性。一致地,我们通过免疫组织化学鉴定出多个脑区、脊髓背角内的抑制性中间神经元以及皮下组织内的免疫细胞——而非外周感觉神经元——共同表达CRF受体和阿片肽。与这些解剖学发现一致,在疼痛传递的这三个水平中的每一个水平上,将CRF与阿片受体拮抗剂纳洛酮联合局部给药,均可剂量依赖性地逆转CRF的抗伤害感受作用。因此,在脑、脊髓和外周水平局部应用低剂量、全身无活性的CRF,最有可能通过激活共同表达阿片肽的细胞上的CRF受体来抑制持续性炎性疼痛,从而导致阿片介导的疼痛抑制。未来的研究必须明确内源性CRF在这三个水平上是否以阿片介导的方式有助于机体应对应激刺激疼痛的反应。