Gratzke Christian, Hudelmaier Martin, Hitzl Wolfgang, Glaser Christian, Eckstein Felix
Musculoskeletal Research Group, Institute of Anatomy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1346-53. doi: 10.1177/0363546507299746. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
Whereas muscle and bone mass have been shown to strongly depend on mechanical stimulation (loading history), this relationship has not been established for articular cartilage.
Subjects with high muscle strength display thicker knee cartilage and larger joint surface areas than nonathletic volunteers, and knee cartilage morphologic characteristics correlate more strongly with muscle force than with muscle cross-sectional areas.
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Fourteen young, healthy adult professional athletes (7 weight lifters and 7 bobsled sprinters) were examined and compared with 14 adult nonathletic volunteers who had never performed strength training. Muscle moments were measured with a dynamometer and muscle cross-sectional areas and knee cartilage morphologic characteristics with magnetic resonance imaging.
Weight lifters and sprinters displayed significantly (P < .001) larger extensor muscle moments and cross-sectional areas. They showed significantly greater (P < .01) patellar cartilage thickness than nonathletic volunteers (+14% [95% confidence interval, 6% to 22%] and +17% [95% confidence interval, 9% to 26%], respectively) but no significant differences in the cartilage thickness of the other knee joint cartilage plates or joint surface areas. Muscle moments did not correlate more strongly with knee cartilage volume or thickness than muscle cross-sectional areas of the thigh.
Direct measurements of muscle forces do not predict cartilage thickness more accurately than muscle cross-sectional areas. These findings suggest that cartilage thickness has much less ability, if any, to adapt to mechanical loading than muscle. Large cohorts of athletes will need to be studied to detect potentially significant differences in cartilage versus nonathletic controls.
虽然肌肉和骨量已被证明强烈依赖于机械刺激(负荷历史),但这种关系在关节软骨中尚未确立。
与非运动员志愿者相比,具有高肌肉力量的受试者表现出更厚的膝关节软骨和更大的关节表面积,并且膝关节软骨形态特征与肌肉力量的相关性比与肌肉横截面积的相关性更强。
横断面研究;证据水平,3级。
对14名年轻、健康的成年职业运动员(7名举重运动员和7名雪橇短跑运动员)进行检查,并与14名从未进行过力量训练的成年非运动员志愿者进行比较。使用测力计测量肌肉力矩,使用磁共振成像测量肌肉横截面积和膝关节软骨形态特征。
举重运动员和短跑运动员表现出显著更大(P <.001)的伸肌力矩和横截面积。他们的髌软骨厚度比非运动员志愿者显著更大(P <.01)(分别增加14%[95%置信区间,6%至22%]和17%[95%置信区间,9%至26%]),但其他膝关节软骨板的软骨厚度或关节表面积没有显著差异。与大腿肌肉横截面积相比,肌肉力矩与膝关节软骨体积或厚度的相关性并不更强。
直接测量肌肉力量并不能比肌肉横截面积更准确地预测软骨厚度。这些发现表明,软骨厚度适应机械负荷的能力(如果有的话)比肌肉要小得多。需要对大量运动员进行研究,以检测软骨与非运动员对照之间潜在的显著差异。