Liew Chee-Gee, Draper Jonathan S, Walsh James, Moore Harry, Andrews Peter W
Centre for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Biomedical Science, Western Bank, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
Stem Cells. 2007 Jun;25(6):1521-8. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0634. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
Plasmid vectors remain a valuable yet capricious tool for the genetic manipulation of human embryonic stem (hES) cells. We have compared the efficacy of four promoters to mediate transient and stable transfection in hES and human embryonal carcinoma cell lines with the reporter enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP). In transient assays, the two mammalian promoters, UbiquitinC and Rosa26 (pUbiC and pR26), the human cytomegalovirus major immediate early promoter (HCMV-MIE; pCMV), and the HCMV-MIE/chicken beta-actin/rabbit beta-globin hybrid promoter (pCAGG) gave variable results that depended upon the cell line transfected but in an unpredictable way: each promoter supported strong transient expression in at least one cell line. The results for stable transfection were generally at variance with the transient assays. In each case, transgene silencing was quite marked, most notably with the pCMV, with which no eGFP-positive clones were obtained. An exception was the pCAG vector, in which the CAGG composite promoter is linked to the polyoma virus mutant enhancer PyF101; stable eGFP-positive transfectants were obtained, and these clones retained eGFP expression for over 120 passages, even in the absence of selection. However, if the PyF101 elements were removed, the resulting transfectants were also subjected to progressive gene silencing. Thus, the choice of promoter is critical for determining the desired effect of transgene expression in hES cells. Our data also demonstrate that pUbiC, pR26, pCAGG, and pCAG are more superior to the pCMV for generation of stable transfectants in hES cells. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
质粒载体仍然是用于人类胚胎干细胞(hES)基因操作的一种有价值但不稳定的工具。我们用报告基因增强型绿色荧光蛋白(eGFP)比较了四种启动子在hES和人胚胎癌细胞系中介导瞬时转染和稳定转染的效率。在瞬时分析中,两种哺乳动物启动子泛素C和Rosa26(pUbiC和pR26)、人巨细胞病毒主要立即早期启动子(HCMV-MIE;pCMV)以及HCMV-MIE/鸡β-肌动蛋白/兔β-珠蛋白杂交启动子(pCAGG)给出了各不相同的结果,这些结果取决于所转染的细胞系,但方式不可预测:每个启动子在至少一种细胞系中都支持强瞬时表达。稳定转染的结果通常与瞬时分析不同。在每种情况下,转基因沉默都很明显,最显著的是pCMV,用它未获得eGFP阳性克隆。例外的是pCAG载体,其中CAGG复合启动子与多瘤病毒突变增强子PyF101相连;获得了稳定的eGFP阳性转染子,这些克隆即使在没有选择的情况下也能在超过120代中保持eGFP表达。然而,如果去除PyF101元件,所得转染子也会逐渐发生基因沉默。因此,启动子的选择对于确定hES细胞中转基因表达的预期效果至关重要。我们的数据还表明,在hES细胞中生成稳定转染子时,pUbiC、pR26、pCAGG和pCAG比pCMV更具优势。潜在利益冲突的披露见本文末尾。