Kozek-Langenecker S
Clinical Division B, Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Vienna Medical University, Vienna, Austria.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;73(7-8):401-15. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
Coagulopathy associated with massive operative blood loss is an intricate, multicellular and multifactorial event. Massive bleeding can either be anticipated (during major surgery with high risk of bleeding) or unexpected. Management requires preoperative risk evaluation and preoperative optimization (discontinuation or modification of anticoagulant drugs, prophylactic coagulation therapy). Intraoperatively, the causal diagnosis of the complex pathophysiology of massive bleeding requiring rapid and specific coagulation management is critical for the patient's outcome. Treatment and transfusion algorithms, based on repeated and timely point-of-care coagulation testing and on the clinical judgment, are to be encouraged. The time lapse for reporting results and insufficient identification of the hemostatic defect are obstacles for conventional laboratory coagulation tests. The evidence is growing that rotational thrombelastometry or modified thrombelastography are superior to routine laboratory tests in guiding intraoperative coagulation management. Specific platelet function tests may be of value in platelet-dependent bleeding associated e.g. with extracorporeal circulation, antiplatelet therapy, inherited or acquired platelet defects. Therapeutic approaches include the use of blood products (red cell concentrates, platelets, plasma), coagulation factor concentrates (fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, von Willebrand factor), pharmacological agents (antifibrinolytic drugs, desmopressin), and local factors (fibrin glue). The importance of normothermia, normovolemia, and homeostasis for hemostasis must not be overlooked. The present article reviews pathomechanisms of coagulopathy in massive bleeding, as well as routine laboratory tests and viscoelastic point-of-care hemostasis monitoring as the diagnostic basis for therapeutic interventions.
与大量手术失血相关的凝血功能障碍是一个复杂的、多细胞和多因素的过程。大量出血可能是可预见的(在出血风险高的大手术期间)或不可预见的。管理需要术前风险评估和术前优化(停用或调整抗凝药物、预防性凝血治疗)。术中,对于需要快速和特异性凝血管理的大量出血的复杂病理生理学进行因果诊断对患者的预后至关重要。应鼓励基于重复和及时的床旁凝血检测以及临床判断的治疗和输血算法。传统实验室凝血检测存在报告结果的时间延迟和止血缺陷识别不足的问题。越来越多的证据表明,旋转血栓弹力图或改良血栓弹力描记法在指导术中凝血管理方面优于常规实验室检测。特定的血小板功能检测对于例如与体外循环、抗血小板治疗、遗传性或获得性血小板缺陷相关的血小板依赖性出血可能有价值。治疗方法包括使用血液制品(红细胞浓缩物、血小板、血浆)、凝血因子浓缩物(纤维蛋白原、凝血酶原复合物、血管性血友病因子)、药物制剂(抗纤溶药物、去氨加压素)和局部因素(纤维蛋白胶)。必须重视体温正常、血容量正常和内环境稳定对止血的重要性。本文综述了大量出血中凝血功能障碍的发病机制,以及作为治疗干预诊断依据的常规实验室检测和粘弹性床旁止血监测。