Rotational thromboelastometry thresholds for patients at risk for massive transfusion.

BACKGROUND

Goal-directed hemostatic resuscitation based on thrombelastography has a survival benefit compared to conventional coagulation assays. While thrombelastography transfusion thresholds for patients at risk for massive transfusion (MT) have been defined, similar cutoffs do not exist for the other commonly used viscoelastic assay, rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). The purpose of this study was to develop ROTEM blood product thresholds in patients at risk for MT.

METHODS

ROTEM was assessed in trauma activation patients admitted from 2010 to 2016 (n = 222). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to test the predictive performance of ROTEM measurements in patients requiring MT. The Youden Index defined optimal thresholds for ROTEM-based resuscitation.

RESULTS

Patients who required MT (n = 37, 17%) were more severely injured. EXTEM clotting time (CT) was longer in patients with MT compared to non-MT (87 versus 64 s, P < 0.0001). EXTEM angle was shallower in MT patients compared to non-MT (54° versus 69°, P < 0.0001). Clot amplitude after 10 min (CA10) was less in MT compared to non-MT patients (30.5 versus 50 mm, P < 0.0001). Clot lysis index 60 min (CLI60) was lower in patients who had MT than non-MT (47 versus 94%, P = 0.0006). EXTEM CT yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) = 0.7116 and a cut point of >78.5 s. EXTEM angle had an AUROC = 0.865 and a cut point of <64.5°. EXTEM CA10 had an AUROC = 0.858, with a cut point of <40.5 mm. CLI60 had an AUROC = 0.6788 with a cut point at <74%.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified ROTEM thresholds for transfusion of blood components in severely injured patients requiring an MT. Based on our analysis, we propose plasma transfusion for EXTEM CT > 78.5 s, fibrinogen for angle <64.5°, platelet transfusion for CA10 < 40.5 mm, and antifibrinolytics for CLI60 < 74%.