Suppr超能文献

使用戈林公式和基于心血管磁共振的混合方法验证峰均值压力降低率作为评估主动脉瓣狭窄的新方法。

Validation of the peak to mean pressure decrease ratio as a new method of assessing aortic stenosis using the Gorlin formula and the cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based hybrid method.

作者信息

Haghi Dariusch, Kaden Jens J, Suselbeck Tim, Fluechter Stephan, Breithardt Ole A, Poerner Tudor, Kalmar Gabor, Borggrefe Martin, Papavassiliu Theano

机构信息

Medical Department, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2007 Apr;24(4):335-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00416.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to validate the recently introduced peak to mean pressure decrease ratio (PMPDR), using the Gorlin formula and a hybrid method which combines cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived stroke volume with transaortic Doppler measurements to calculate aortic valve area (AVA).

METHODS

Data analysis in 32 patients with severe (AVA <or= 0.75 cm(2)) or moderate aortic stenosis who had prospectively been entered into our aortic stenosis database.

RESULTS

Gorlin-derived AVA was 0.61 +/- 0.10 cm(2) in severe and 0.92 +/- 0.14 cm(2) in moderate aortic stenosis (P < 0.01). Corresponding values for PMPRD were 1.61 +/- 0.10 and 1.73 +/- 0.18, respectively (P < 0.05). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for PMPDR <1.5 to predict severe aortic stenosis were 0.12, 0.92, 0.67, and 0.44 as assessed by the Gorlin formula.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Gorlin formula as the reference standard, our study confirms results of a previously reported study on the performance of PMPDR for assessment of aortic stenosis.

摘要

背景

我们试图验证最近引入的峰压与平均压降低率(PMPDR),使用戈林公式以及一种将心血管磁共振(CMR)得出的每搏输出量与经主动脉多普勒测量相结合以计算主动脉瓣面积(AVA)的混合方法。

方法

对32例重度(AVA≤0.75 cm²)或中度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的数据分析,这些患者已前瞻性地纳入我们的主动脉瓣狭窄数据库。

结果

重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经戈林公式得出的AVA为0.61±0.10 cm²,中度患者为0.92±0.14 cm²(P<0.01)。PMPRD的相应值分别为1.61±0.10和1.73±0.18(P<0.05)。经戈林公式评估,PMPDR<1.5预测重度主动脉瓣狭窄的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为0.12、0.92、0.67和0.44。

结论

以戈林公式作为参考标准,我们的研究证实了先前一项关于PMPDR评估主动脉瓣狭窄性能的研究结果。

相似文献

5
Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Nov;109(11):618-625. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Mar;98(3):234-42. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012005000017. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease.
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009 Sep;6(3):160-6. doi: 10.1007/s11897-009-0023-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验