Tebbutt G M
HPA North East, Newcastle Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK.
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Apr;102(4):883-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03311.x.
This review looks at the contribution of microbiological sampling to the safety of retail foods in England and Wales. It compares sampling methods available and assesses the value of testing as part of outbreaks of foodborne disease, as part of routine management by local authorities, as part of work done or commissioned by the food industry, and as part of research. It confirms that microbiological testing has a role during outbreaks as it makes a significant contribution to help identify foods and other areas of greatest risk for future study. The review suggests that routine testing by local authorities is often of limited use and could be improved by more targeted surveillance. Testing could be better used to validate primary control methods, such as Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) system. Any public health benefit from testing in the food industry is often restricted by client confidentiality. Microbial research on foods is important as it can lead to significant improvements in safety. Current microbiological methods are slow and, in future, rapid molecular methods may make an even bigger contribution to the control of foodborne disease.
本综述探讨了微生物采样对英格兰和威尔士零售食品安全性的贡献。它比较了现有的采样方法,并评估了作为食源性疾病暴发的一部分、作为地方当局日常管理的一部分、作为食品行业所做或委托工作的一部分以及作为研究的一部分进行检测的价值。它证实微生物检测在疾病暴发期间发挥着作用,因为它有助于识别食品及其他未来研究中风险最大的领域。该综述表明,地方当局的常规检测往往用处有限,通过更有针对性的监测可以加以改进。检测可更好地用于验证诸如危害分析与关键控制点(HACCP)系统等主要控制方法。食品行业检测所带来的任何公共卫生益处通常都受到客户保密规定的限制。对食品进行微生物研究很重要,因为它可以带来安全性方面的显著改善。目前的微生物学方法较为缓慢,未来快速分子方法可能会对食源性疾病的控制做出更大贡献。