Kim Samuel C, Matlaga Brian R, Tinmouth William W, Kuo Ramsay L, Evan Andrew P, McAteer James A, Williams James C, Lingeman James E
Methodist Hospital Institute for Kidney Stone Disease and Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
J Urol. 2007 Apr;177(4):1363-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.033.
The Cyberwand (Cybersonics, Erie, Pennsylvania) is a novel intracorporeal lithotrite that uses coaxial ultrasonic elements operating at 2 frequencies. We compared this device to the LithoClast(R) Ultra, which we previously noted is the most efficient commercially available intracorporeal lithotripsy device.
An in vitro test system was used to assess the efficiency of stone penetration for the Cyberwand and the LithoClast Ultra. The devices were mounted upright with the probe tip up in a modified irrigation sheath. A gypsum artificial stone was centered on the probe tip and a mass was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. The manufacturer recommended setting was selected for the Cyberwand, while for the LithoClast Ultra a pneumatic frequency of 12 Hz with an ultrasonic power setting of 100% was selected, representing optimal settings in previous in vitro tests. The time required for complete stone penetration was measured. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA.
Mean +/- SD penetration time for the Cyberwand was significantly shorter than for the LithoClast Ultra (4.8 +/- 0.6 vs 8.1 +/- 0.6 seconds, p <0.0001). Neither device showed any difficulties with overheating, occlusion or another malfunction.
Initial assessment using our hands-free in vitro test system, in which stone penetration time is not affected by operator bias, suggests that the Cyberwand is an efficient lithotrite. These promising results justify in vivo testing.
Cyberwand(Cybersonics公司,宾夕法尼亚州伊利)是一种新型体内碎石器,它使用两个频率工作的同轴超声元件。我们将该设备与LithoClast® Ultra进行了比较,我们之前指出后者是市面上最有效的体内碎石设备。
使用体外测试系统评估Cyberwand和LithoClast Ultra的结石穿透效率。将设备直立安装,探头尖端向上置于改良的冲洗鞘中。将一块石膏人工结石置于探头尖端中心,并在结石上方放置一个重物以提供恒定压力。Cyberwand选择制造商推荐的设置,而LithoClast Ultra选择气动频率为12 Hz且超声功率设置为100%,这代表了之前体外测试中的最佳设置。测量结石完全穿透所需的时间。使用方差分析比较平均结石穿透时间的差异。
Cyberwand的平均±标准差穿透时间明显短于LithoClast Ultra(4.8±0.6秒对8.1±0.6秒,p<0.0001)。两种设备均未出现任何过热、堵塞或其他故障问题。
使用我们的免手持体外测试系统进行的初步评估表明,Cyberwand是一种有效的碎石器,在该测试系统中结石穿透时间不受操作者偏差的影响。这些有前景的结果证明了进行体内测试的合理性。