Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 3240A Medical Science Building I, 1301 Catherine St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5667, USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Apr;31(4):623-34. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.623.
Applications of ultrasound in medicine for therapeutic purposes have been accepted and beneficial uses of ultrasonic biological effects for many years. Low-power ultrasound of about 1 MHz has been widely applied since the 1950s for physical therapy in conditions such as tendinitis and bursitis. In the 1980s, high-pressure-amplitude shock waves came into use for mechanically resolving kidney stones, and "lithotripsy" rapidly replaced surgery as the most frequent treatment choice. The use of ultrasonic energy for therapy continues to expand, and approved applications now include uterine fibroid ablation, cataract removal (phacoemulsification), surgical tissue cutting and hemostasis, transdermal drug delivery, and bone fracture healing, among others. Undesirable bioeffects can occur, including burns from thermal-based therapies and severe hemorrhage from mechanical-based therapies (eg, lithotripsy). In all of these therapeutic applications of ultrasound bioeffects, standardization, ultrasound dosimetry, benefits assurance, and side-effect risk minimization must be carefully considered to ensure an optimal benefit to risk ratio for the patient. Therapeutic ultrasound typically has well-defined benefits and risks and therefore presents a manageable safety problem to the clinician. However, safety information can be scattered, confusing, or subject to commercial conflicts of interest. Of paramount importance for managing this problem is the communication of practical safety information by authoritative groups, such as the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, to the medical ultrasound community. In this overview, the Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine outlines the wide range of therapeutic ultrasound methods, which are in clinical use or under study, and provides general guidance for ensuring therapeutic ultrasound safety.
超声在医学中的应用已有多年,其治疗用途已被广泛接受,超声生物学效应的有益用途也已被广泛应用。自 20 世纪 50 年代以来,1MHz 左右的低功率超声已广泛应用于治疗腱鞘炎和滑囊炎等疾病的物理疗法。20 世纪 80 年代,高振幅压力冲击波开始用于机械性解决肾结石问题,“碎石术”迅速取代手术成为最常见的治疗选择。超声治疗的应用范围不断扩大,目前已批准的应用包括子宫肌瘤消融、白内障切除(超声乳化)、手术组织切割和止血、经皮药物输送以及骨折愈合等。可能会出现不良的生物效应,包括热疗引起的灼伤和机械治疗引起的严重出血(例如碎石术)。在所有这些超声生物效应的治疗应用中,必须仔细考虑标准化、超声剂量学、效益保证和副作用风险最小化,以确保患者获得最佳的效益-风险比。治疗性超声通常具有明确的益处和风险,因此对临床医生来说是一个可管理的安全问题。然而,安全信息可能分散、混乱或受到商业利益冲突的影响。管理这个问题的当务之急是权威组织(如美国超声医学研究所)向医学超声界传达实用的安全信息。在这篇概述中,美国超声医学研究所的生物效应委员会概述了广泛的治疗性超声方法,这些方法正在临床应用或研究中,并为确保治疗性超声安全提供了一般性指导。