Saigal Christopher S, Movassaghi Mehran, Pace Jennifer, Joyce Geoffrey
Department of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
J Urol. 2007 Apr;177(4):1463-7; discussion 1467. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.083.
Although medical therapy for newly diagnosed benign prostatic hyperplasia is initially less expensive than surgery, to our knowledge the long-term costs of these treatments are unknown. We defined longer term costs of these treatment strategies.
We examined spending on benign prostatic hyperplasia related services by examining health care claims for a 5-year period subsequent to a new benign prostatic hyperplasia diagnosis. Expenditures for subjects treated initially with surgery were compared to expenditures for those with initial medical treatment. Expenditures were projected during longer periods and the net current value of these expenditures was calculated.
Of the 970 subjects identified who received benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment 913 (94.1%) relied on medical therapy as initial treatment. Of those subjects 832 (91.1%) were on alpha-blockers. The secondary treatment rates for surgery far exceeded those for medical therapy (37% vs 8%). Average total expenditures were higher for subjects who initially received surgery ($12,699, 95% CI 9,865-15,533) than for those initially treated with medication ($2,193, 95% CI 1,959-2,428). If future streams of spending were discounted at standard rates (3%), the costs of initial medical therapy as a treatment strategy would always be lower than those of initial surgical therapy even at 40 years.
In a cohort of privately insured men with newly diagnosed benign prostatic hyperplasia monotherapy with alpha-blockers was the most common initial treatment. Surgical therapy was associated with higher treatment failure rates and higher costs during 5 years. Increased expenditures related to initial surgical therapy were consistent when projected over long time frames.
虽然新诊断的良性前列腺增生症的药物治疗最初比手术治疗成本更低,但据我们所知,这些治疗的长期成本尚不清楚。我们确定了这些治疗策略的长期成本。
我们通过检查新诊断为良性前列腺增生症后的5年期间的医疗保健索赔,来研究与良性前列腺增生症相关服务的支出情况。将最初接受手术治疗的受试者的支出与最初接受药物治疗的受试者的支出进行比较。对更长时期的支出进行了预测,并计算了这些支出的净现值。
在确定接受良性前列腺增生症治疗的970名受试者中,913名(94.1%)依赖药物治疗作为初始治疗。在这些受试者中,832名(91.1%)使用α受体阻滞剂。手术的二次治疗率远远超过药物治疗(37%对8%)。最初接受手术的受试者的平均总支出(12,699美元,95%可信区间9,865 - 15,533美元)高于最初接受药物治疗的受试者(2,193美元,95%可信区间1,959 - 2,428美元)。如果未来的支出流以标准利率(3%)进行贴现,即使在40年时,作为一种治疗策略的初始药物治疗成本也总是低于初始手术治疗成本。
在一组新诊断为良性前列腺增生症的私人保险男性队列中,α受体阻滞剂单药治疗是最常见的初始治疗方法。手术治疗在5年期间与更高的治疗失败率和更高的成本相关。在长期预测中,与初始手术治疗相关的支出增加是一致的。