Suppr超能文献

使用血管闭合装置的心脏导管插入术血管并发症风险的倾向分析。

A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices.

作者信息

Arora Nipun, Matheny Michael E, Sepke Carrie, Resnic Frederic S

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2007 Apr;153(4):606-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.12.014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complications of vascular access are one of the most common adverse events after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are reported to occur in 1% to 9% of cases. There are conflicting reports of the association of vascular complications with the use of vascular closure devices (VCDs). The purpose of this study was to assess femoral arterial access-related vascular outcomes after invasive cardiology procedures with the routine use of VCDs.

METHODS

A total of 12,937 consecutive patients were studied for inhospital outcomes through a prospective registry from January 2002 to December 2005. Of these, 6913 (53%) patients underwent PCI and 9996 (77%) patients received VCDs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of vascular complications. A propensity analysis of VCD use was performed to account for potential bias in the likelihood of using such devices.

RESULTS

Vascular complications occurred in 0.7% of diagnostic angiography and 2.7% of PCI patients. The risk of vascular complications was significantly lower with closure device use compared with manual compression in both diagnostic angiography (0.5% vs 1.1%, P = .01*) and PCI (2.4% vs 4.9%, P < .001*) groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, after accounting for the propensity to use such devices, revealed that VCD use was associated with a 58% (95% CI 19%-88%) reduction in the risk of vascular complications in diagnostic procedures catheterization and a 42% (95% CI 17%-59%) reduction in PCI patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary practice, VCDs offer reduced risk of vascular complications as compared with manual compression in appropriately selected patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterizations.

摘要

背景

血管通路并发症是冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后最常见的不良事件之一,据报道发生率为1%至9%。关于血管并发症与血管闭合装置(VCD)使用之间的关联,存在相互矛盾的报道。本研究的目的是评估在常规使用VCD的侵入性心脏病学操作后,股动脉通路相关的血管结局。

方法

通过前瞻性登记研究了2002年1月至2005年12月期间连续的12937例患者的住院结局。其中,6913例(53%)患者接受了PCI,9996例(77%)患者接受了VCD。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析来确定血管并发症的预测因素。对VCD的使用进行倾向分析,以考虑使用此类装置可能性中的潜在偏倚。

结果

诊断性血管造影患者中血管并发症发生率为0.7%,PCI患者中为2.7%。在诊断性血管造影(0.5%对1.1%,P = 0.01*)和PCI(2.4%对4.9%,P < 0.001*)组中,与手动压迫相比,使用闭合装置时血管并发症的风险显著降低。在考虑使用此类装置的倾向后,多因素逻辑回归分析显示,在诊断性导管插入术中,使用VCD与血管并发症风险降低58%(95%CI 19%-88%)相关,在PCI患者中降低42%(95%CI 17%-59%)。

结论

在当代实践中,对于适当选择的接受诊断性和治疗性心导管插入术的患者,与手动压迫相比,VCD可降低血管并发症的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验