Arora Nipun, Matheny Michael E, Sepke Carrie, Resnic Frederic S
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Am Heart J. 2007 Apr;153(4):606-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.12.014.
Complications of vascular access are one of the most common adverse events after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are reported to occur in 1% to 9% of cases. There are conflicting reports of the association of vascular complications with the use of vascular closure devices (VCDs). The purpose of this study was to assess femoral arterial access-related vascular outcomes after invasive cardiology procedures with the routine use of VCDs.
A total of 12,937 consecutive patients were studied for inhospital outcomes through a prospective registry from January 2002 to December 2005. Of these, 6913 (53%) patients underwent PCI and 9996 (77%) patients received VCDs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of vascular complications. A propensity analysis of VCD use was performed to account for potential bias in the likelihood of using such devices.
Vascular complications occurred in 0.7% of diagnostic angiography and 2.7% of PCI patients. The risk of vascular complications was significantly lower with closure device use compared with manual compression in both diagnostic angiography (0.5% vs 1.1%, P = .01*) and PCI (2.4% vs 4.9%, P < .001*) groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, after accounting for the propensity to use such devices, revealed that VCD use was associated with a 58% (95% CI 19%-88%) reduction in the risk of vascular complications in diagnostic procedures catheterization and a 42% (95% CI 17%-59%) reduction in PCI patients.
In contemporary practice, VCDs offer reduced risk of vascular complications as compared with manual compression in appropriately selected patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterizations.
血管通路并发症是冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后最常见的不良事件之一,据报道发生率为1%至9%。关于血管并发症与血管闭合装置(VCD)使用之间的关联,存在相互矛盾的报道。本研究的目的是评估在常规使用VCD的侵入性心脏病学操作后,股动脉通路相关的血管结局。
通过前瞻性登记研究了2002年1月至2005年12月期间连续的12937例患者的住院结局。其中,6913例(53%)患者接受了PCI,9996例(77%)患者接受了VCD。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析来确定血管并发症的预测因素。对VCD的使用进行倾向分析,以考虑使用此类装置可能性中的潜在偏倚。
诊断性血管造影患者中血管并发症发生率为0.7%,PCI患者中为2.7%。在诊断性血管造影(0.5%对1.1%,P = 0.01*)和PCI(2.4%对4.9%,P < 0.001*)组中,与手动压迫相比,使用闭合装置时血管并发症的风险显著降低。在考虑使用此类装置的倾向后,多因素逻辑回归分析显示,在诊断性导管插入术中,使用VCD与血管并发症风险降低58%(95%CI 19%-88%)相关,在PCI患者中降低42%(95%CI 17%-59%)。
在当代实践中,对于适当选择的接受诊断性和治疗性心导管插入术的患者,与手动压迫相比,VCD可降低血管并发症的风险。