Govindarajulu Usha S, Goldfarb David, Resnic Frederic S
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, SUNY Downstate School of Public Health, Brooklyn, NY.
Department of Cardiology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA.
J Med Stat Inform. 2018 Feb 16;6. doi: 10.7243/2053-7662-6-2.
In the use of medical device procedures, learning effects have been shown to have a significant impact on the outcome, and are a critical component of medical device safety surveillance. To support estimation of these effects, we evaluated our methods for modeling these rates within several different actual datasets representing patients treated by physicians clustered within institutions to show the flexibility of this method across applications.
In order to estimate the learning curve effects, we employed our unique modeling for the learning curves to incorporate the learning hierarchy between institution and physicians, and then modeled them within established methods that work with hierarchical data such as generalized estimating equations (GEE). Within the actual datasets, we looked at two device types and also two procedure types which had not been observed before: off pump coronary artery bypass (CABG) experience, and radial access experience. We also tried mediation analyses within the GEE framework for these various devices/procedures as well.
We found that the choice of shape used to produce the "learning-free" dataset would still be dataset specific depending upon needs for modeling fast or slow learning but that in general the power series or logarithmic shapes would be better for modeling slower learning while exponential may be better for faster learning. Mediation analysis also showed promise in adapting the modeling of the learning curve.
In showing the flexibility of using our method in various applications; this time utilizing more than one possible procedure done per patient so that each physician had more volume, we were able to show the flexibility of applying our method in different data applications to allow for more accurately capturing the learning curve rates in physicians nested within institutions. This can, therefore, be used across the board for device and procedure safety.
在医疗设备操作的使用中,学习效应已被证明对结果有重大影响,并且是医疗设备安全监测的关键组成部分。为了支持对这些效应的评估,我们在几个不同的实际数据集中评估了我们对这些发生率进行建模的方法,这些数据集代表了在机构内聚类的医生所治疗的患者,以展示该方法在不同应用中的灵活性。
为了估计学习曲线效应,我们采用了独特的学习曲线建模方法,以纳入机构和医生之间的学习层次结构,然后在诸如广义估计方程(GEE)等适用于层次数据的既定方法中对其进行建模。在实际数据集中,我们研究了两种设备类型以及两种以前未观察到的操作类型:非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)经验和桡动脉穿刺经验。我们还在GEE框架内对这些不同的设备/操作进行了中介分析。
我们发现,用于生成“无学习”数据集的形状选择仍将取决于对快速或慢速学习建模的需求,具体取决于数据集,但一般而言,幂级数或对数形状对于较慢学习的建模可能更好,而指数形状对于较快学习可能更好。中介分析在调整学习曲线建模方面也显示出前景。
通过展示我们的方法在各种应用中的灵活性;这次每个患者采用了不止一种可能的操作,以便每个医生有更多的工作量,我们能够展示在不同数据应用中应用我们的方法的灵活性,以便更准确地捕捉机构内医生的学习曲线发生率。因此,这可以广泛用于设备和操作安全。