Lenard Natalie R, Daniels David J, Portoghese Philip S, Roerig Sandra C
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, United States.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2007 Jul 2;566(1-3):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.02.040. Epub 2007 Mar 3.
Treatment of pain with opioids is limited by their potential abuse liability. In an effort to develop analgesics without this side effect, a series of bivalent ligands containing a mu-opioid receptor agonist pharmacophore connected to a delta-opioid receptor antagonist pharmacophore through variable-length spacers (16-21 atoms) was synthesized. Members of this series [mu-opioid receptor (M)-delta-opioid receptor (D)-agonist (A)-antagonists (N): MDANs] are antinociceptive in the tail flick assay, but antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence do not develop to ligands having spacers with 19-21 atoms. The current studies compared the rewarding properties of three bivalent ligands (MDAN-16, -19 and -21) and a mu-opioid receptor agonist (MA-19) to those of morphine in the conditioned place preference assay in mice after i.v. administration. Place preference developed to morphine and to MA-19, but not to the MDANs. The responses to MDAN-16 were highly variable, although place preference of borderline significance appeared to develop. Reinstatement was also evaluated after extinguishing morphine conditioned place preference; morphine and MA-19, but not the MDANs, reinstated morphine conditioned place preference. Taken together, these results suggest that the bivalents are less rewarding compared to morphine in opioid-naïve mice and do not induce reinstatement in previously morphine-preferring mice. The lack of a conditioned place preference response for MDAN-19 and -21, compared to the equivocal results with MDAN-16, suggests a minimum distance requirement between mu-opioid receptor and delta-opioid receptor recognition sites. This requirement may reflect the binding of MDAN-19 and -21 to mu-opioid receptor-delta-opioid receptor heterodimeric receptors that block reward but not antinociception.
阿片类药物治疗疼痛受到其潜在滥用可能性的限制。为了开发没有这种副作用的镇痛药,合成了一系列二价配体,这些配体包含一个通过可变长度间隔基团(16 - 21个原子)连接到δ-阿片受体拮抗剂药效基团的μ-阿片受体激动剂药效基团。该系列成员[μ-阿片受体(M)-δ-阿片受体(D)-激动剂(A)-拮抗剂(N):MDANs]在甩尾试验中具有抗伤害感受作用,但对于间隔基团含有19 - 21个原子的配体,不会产生抗伤害感受耐受性和身体依赖性。当前研究在小鼠静脉注射给药后,通过条件性位置偏爱试验比较了三种二价配体(MDAN - 16、- 19和 - 21)以及一种μ-阿片受体激动剂(MA - 19)与吗啡的奖赏特性。吗啡和MA - 19能产生位置偏爱,但MDANs不能。对MDAN - 16的反应高度可变,尽管似乎出现了具有临界显著性的位置偏爱。在消除吗啡条件性位置偏爱后也评估了复吸情况;吗啡和MA - 19能使吗啡条件性位置偏爱复吸,但MDANs不能。综上所述,这些结果表明,在未使用过阿片类药物的小鼠中,与吗啡相比,二价配体的奖赏性较低,并且在先前偏爱吗啡的小鼠中不会诱发复吸。与MDAN - 16的不明确结果相比,MDAN - 19和 - 21缺乏条件性位置偏爱反应,这表明μ-阿片受体和δ-阿片受体识别位点之间存在最小距离要求。这一要求可能反映了MDAN - 19和 - 21与μ-阿片受体 - δ-阿片受体异二聚体受体的结合,这种结合会阻断奖赏但不会阻断抗伤害感受。