Brain Barriers Research Center (J.I.G., M.K., A.S.M., S.R., W.F.E.), Department of Pharmaceutics (J.I.G., M.K., A.S.M., S.R., C.A.F., W.F.E.), Department of Pharmacology (D.J.B., C.A.F., G.L.W.), Department of Neuroscience (C.D.P., K.F.K., C.A.F., G.L.W.), and Department of Dermatology (G.L.W.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Elmquist Laboratory, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Brain Barriers Research Center (J.I.G., M.K., A.S.M., S.R., W.F.E.), Department of Pharmaceutics (J.I.G., M.K., A.S.M., S.R., C.A.F., W.F.E.), Department of Pharmacology (D.J.B., C.A.F., G.L.W.), Department of Neuroscience (C.D.P., K.F.K., C.A.F., G.L.W.), and Department of Dermatology (G.L.W.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Elmquist Laboratory, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2022 Jan;380(1):34-46. doi: 10.1124/jpet.121.000821. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
Novel combinations of specific opioid agonists like loperamide and oxymorphindole targeting the - and -opioid receptors, respectively, have shown increased potency with minimized opioid-associated risks. However, whether their interaction is pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic in nature has not been determined. This study quantitatively determined whether these drugs have a pharmacokinetic interaction that alters systemic disposition or central nervous system (CNS) distribution. We performed intravenous and oral in vivo pharmacokinetic assessments of both drugs after discrete dosing and administration in combination to determine whether the combination had any effect on systemic pharmacokinetic parameters or CNS exposure. Drugs were administered at 5 or 10 mg/kg i.v. or 30 mg/kg orally to institute for cancer research (ICR) mice and 5 mg/kg i.v. to Friend leukemia virus strain B mice of the following genotypes: wild-type, breast cancer resistance protein ( ) (Bcrp knockout), [P-glycoprotein (P-gp) knockout], and (triple knockout). In the combination, clearance of oxymorphindole (OMI) was reduced by approximately half, and the plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased. Consequently, brain and spinal cord AUCs for OMI in the combination also increased proportionately. Both loperamide and OMI are P-gp substrates, but administration of the two drugs in combination does not alter efflux transport at the CNS barriers. Because OMI alone shows appreciable brain penetration but little therapeutic efficacy on its own, and because loperamide's CNS distribution is unchanged in the combination, the mechanism of action for the increased potency of the combination is most likely pharmacodynamic and most likely occurs at receptors in the peripheral nervous system. This combination has favorable characteristics for future development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Opioids have yet to be replaced as the most effective treatments for moderate-to-severe pain and chronic pain, but their side effects are dangerous. Combinations of opioids with peripheral activity, such as loperamide and oxymorphindole, would be valuable in that they are effective at much lower doses and have reduced risks for dangerous side effects because the -opioid receptor agonist is largely excluded from the CNS.
新型阿片类药物激动剂的组合,如分别靶向 μ-和 δ-阿片受体的洛哌丁胺和羟吗啡酮,显示出增强的效力,同时最小化了与阿片类药物相关的风险。然而,其相互作用是药代动力学还是药效学性质尚未确定。本研究定量确定这些药物是否存在改变系统处置或中枢神经系统 (CNS) 分布的药代动力学相互作用。我们在单独给药和联合给药后进行了这两种药物的静脉内和口服体内药代动力学评估,以确定组合是否对全身药代动力学参数或 CNS 暴露有任何影响。药物以 5 或 10 mg/kg 静脉内或 30 mg/kg 口服给予艾克赛特癌症研究所 (ICR) 小鼠,以 5 mg/kg 静脉内给予 Friend 白血病病毒株 B 小鼠,其基因型为:野生型、乳腺癌耐药蛋白 ( ) (Bcrp 敲除)、[P-糖蛋白 (P-gp) 敲除]和 [三敲除]。在组合中,羟吗啡酮 (OMI) 的清除率降低了约一半,并且血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积 (AUC) 增加。因此,组合中 OMI 的脑和脊髓 AUC 也按比例增加。洛哌丁胺和 OMI 都是 P-gp 底物,但联合使用两种药物不会改变 CNS 屏障中的外排转运。由于 OMI 本身具有可观的脑穿透性,但单独使用时疗效不佳,并且洛哌丁胺在组合中的 CNS 分布没有改变,因此组合增强效力的作用机制很可能是药效学的,并且很可能发生在外周神经系统的受体上。这种组合具有良好的开发前景。意义声明:阿片类药物仍然是治疗中度至重度疼痛和慢性疼痛的最有效药物,但它们的副作用很危险。具有外周活性的阿片类药物的组合,如洛哌丁胺和羟吗啡酮,将具有很高的价值,因为它们在低得多的剂量下有效,并且由于 -阿片受体激动剂在很大程度上被排除在中枢神经系统之外,因此降低了危险副作用的风险。