Sussman Norman, Mullen Jamie, Paulsson Björn, Vågerö Mårten
New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10155, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2007;100 Suppl 1:S55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.02.008. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
The aim of this analysis was to compare the rates of remission/euthymia in patients with bipolar mania receiving quetiapine in combination with lithium/divalproex (QTP+Li/DVP) versus placebo (PBO) in combination with Li/DVP (PBO+Li/DVP).
A pooled analysis of two (one 3-week and one 6-week) double-blind studies of a total of 370 patients hospitalized with bipolar I mania who received quetiapine (up to 800 mg/day) in combination with Li (mean serum concentration 0.76 mEq/L) or DVP (mean serum concentration 69.5 microg/mL) was performed. For both studies, data were analyzed at Day 21. In addition, for the 6-week study, data were analyzed at Day 42. Five different criteria for remission/euthymia were used: (i) Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score < or = 12; (ii) YMRS score < or = 12 plus a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score < or = 10; (iii) YMRS score < or = 12+MADRS score < or = 8; (iv) YMRS score < or = 8; and (v) YMRS score < or = 8 plus a score < or = 2 for the YMRS core items of Irritability, Speech, Content, and Disruptive/Aggressive Behavior.
In the pooled analysis, Day 21 remission rates (YMRS < or = 12) were significantly higher in patients treated with QTP+Li/DVP compared with those who received PBO+Li/DVP (48.7% versus 33.0%, p=0.003). Rates of remission/euthymia (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 10) were similarly improved with QTP+Li/DVP compared with Li/DVP alone (43.2% versus 26.5%, p=0.001). Using the most stringent criteria (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 8), rates of remission/euthymia were again significantly higher with QTP+Li/DVP than with Li/DVP alone (38.4% versus 25.9%, p=0.014). More patients treated with quetiapine met the stringent criterion of YMRS < or = 8 (31.9% versus 24.3%; p=NS). A trend in favor of quetiapine was also observed for the more stringent criterion of YMRS < or = 8 plus core items < or = 2 (28.1% versus 23.2%; p=NS). For the 6-week study, at Day 42, YMRS was < or = 12 in 68.3% of patients treated with QTP+Li/DVP compared with 57.3% of those who received PBO+Li/DVP (p=NS). Respective rates based on the remission criterion of YMRS < or = 8 were 36.5% and 32.3% (p=NS), and with YMRS < or = 8 and core items < or = 2 were 53.8% and 45.8% (p=NS). However, a significant difference was observed between patients treated with QTP+Li/DVP versus those treated with PBO+Li/DVP using criteria of YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 10 (63.5% versus 49.0%, p<0.05) or YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 8 (61.5% versus 46.9%, p<0.05).
At Days 21 and 42, quetiapine combined with Li/DVP compared to Li/DVP monotherapy yielded significant, sustained improvements in the rate of clinical remission/euthymia in patients with bipolar mania. Longer-term studies are warranted to assess whether quetiapine combined with other mood stabilizing medications can yield even longer-term resolution of symptoms of acute mania while concurrently preventing emergence of depressive symptoms.
本分析旨在比较双相躁狂症患者接受喹硫平联合锂盐/丙戊酸盐(QTP+Li/DVP)与安慰剂联合锂盐/丙戊酸盐(PBO+Li/DVP)治疗时的缓解/心境正常率。
对两项双盲研究(一项为期3周,一项为期6周)进行汇总分析,共有370例因双相I型躁狂症住院的患者接受了喹硫平(最高800mg/天)联合锂盐(平均血清浓度0.76mEq/L)或丙戊酸盐(平均血清浓度69.5μg/mL)治疗。两项研究均在第21天进行数据分析。此外,对于6周的研究,在第42天进行数据分析。使用了五种不同的缓解/心境正常标准:(i)青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)评分≤12;(ii)YMRS评分≤12加上蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分≤10;(iii)YMRS评分≤12+MADRS评分≤8;(iv)YMRS评分≤8;以及(v)YMRS评分≤8加上易激惹、言语、内容和破坏/攻击行为的YMRS核心项目评分≤2。
在汇总分析中,与接受PBO+Li/DVP的患者相比,接受QTP+Li/DVP治疗的患者在第21天的缓解率(YMRS≤12)显著更高(48.7%对33.0%,p=0.003)。与单独使用锂盐/丙戊酸盐相比,QTP+Li/DVP治疗的缓解/心境正常率(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤10)同样有所改善(43.2%对26.5%,p=0.001)。使用最严格的标准(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤8),QTP+Li/DVP治疗的缓解/心境正常率再次显著高于单独使用锂盐/丙戊酸盐(38.4%对25.9%,p=0.014)。更多接受喹硫平治疗的患者达到了YMRS≤8的严格标准(31.9%对24.3%;p=无显著差异)。对于更严格的YMRS≤8加上核心项目≤2的标准,也观察到了有利于喹硫平的趋势(28.1%对23.2%;p=无显著差异)。对于6周的研究,在第42天,接受QTP+Li/DVP治疗的患者中有68.3%的YMRS≤12,而接受PBO+Li/DVP治疗的患者中这一比例为57.3%(p=无显著差异)。基于YMRS≤8缓解标准的相应比例分别为36.5%和32.3%(p=无显著差异),而YMRS≤8且核心项目≤2的比例分别为53.8%和45.8%(p=无显著差异)。然而,使用YMRS≤12+MADRS≤10(63.5%对49.0%,p<0.05)或YMRS≤12+MADRS≤8(61.5%对46.9%,p<0.05)的标准时,观察到接受QTP+Li/DVP治疗的患者与接受PBO+Li/DVP治疗的患者之间存在显著差异。
在第21天和第42天,与锂盐/丙戊酸盐单药治疗相比,喹硫平联合锂盐/丙戊酸盐治疗双相躁狂症患者的临床缓解/心境正常率有显著且持续的改善。有必要进行长期研究,以评估喹硫平联合其他心境稳定剂是否能在更长时间内缓解急性躁狂症状,同时预防抑郁症状的出现。