Suppr超能文献

在急性躁狂症患者中,喹硫平单药治疗与安慰剂相比的缓解/心境正常率。

Rates of remission/euthymia with quetiapine monotherapy compared with placebo in patients with acute mania.

作者信息

Ketter Terence A, Jones Martin, Paulsson Björn

机构信息

Stanford University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California 94305-5723, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2007;100 Suppl 1:S45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Mar 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of quetiapine monotherapy compared with placebo on acute (3-week) and more sustained (12-week) rates of response and remission/euthymia in bipolar disorder patients with acute mania.

METHODS

Two similar 12-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies were conducted, with an a priori decision to combine the data and analyze response and remission rates. Response was measured as a decrease of at least 50% in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores from baseline to Day 21 and Day 84. Five remission/euthymia criteria were employed to determine efficacy at Day 21 and Day 84: (i) YMRS score < or = 12; (ii) YMRS score < or = 12 and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score < or = 10; (iii) YMRS score < or = 12 and MADRS score < or = 8; (iv) YMRS score < or = 8; and (v) YMRS score < or = 8 plus a score < or = 2 for the YMRS core items of Irritability, Speech, Content, and Disruptive/Aggressive Behavior.

RESULTS

Patients treated with quetiapine (n=208) and placebo (n=195) had mean YMRS scores at entry of 33.3+/-6.3 and 33.5+/-6.7, respectively. Significantly higher response rates were observed with quetiapine compared with placebo, at Days 21 (48.1% versus 31.3%; p<0.001) and 84 (66.8% versus 40.0%; p<0.001). At Day 21, remission/euthymia rates with quetiapine monotherapy versus placebo were: 37.5% versus 23.1% (YMRS < or = 12), 35.6% versus 21.5% (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 10), 35.1% versus 20.0% (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 8), 25.0% versus 14.4% (YMRS < or = 8), and 21.6% versus 14.4% (YMRS < or = 8 plus core items < or = 2) (p<0.01 for all comparisons except YMRS < or = 8 plus core items < or = 2: p=0.06). By Day 84, these had increased to: 65.4% versus 35.9% (YMRS < or = 12), 60.1% versus 30.8% (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 10), 58.7% versus 29.7% (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 8), 60.1% versus 30.3% (YMRS < or = 8), and 56.7% versus 29.7% (YMRS < or = 8 plus core items < or = 2) (p<0.001 for all comparisons). The average daily dose of quetiapine in responders was 575 mg/day at Day 21 and 598 mg/day at Day 84. Quetiapine was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Quetiapine was associated with significantly higher response and remission/euthymia rates compared with placebo with most criteria used, in patients with acute mania at the end of both 3 and 12 weeks.

摘要

目的

评估喹硫平单药治疗与安慰剂相比,对双相情感障碍急性躁狂患者急性(3周)及更持久(12周)的有效率和缓解/心境正常率的影响。

方法

进行了两项相似的为期12周的多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,事先决定合并数据并分析有效率和缓解率。有效定义为从基线到第21天和第84天,青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)评分至少降低50%。采用五条缓解/心境正常标准来确定第21天和第84天的疗效:(i)YMRS评分≤12;(ii)YMRS评分≤12且蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分≤10;(iii)YMRS评分≤12且MADRS评分≤8;(iv)YMRS评分≤8;(v)YMRS评分≤8加上易激惹、言语、内容及破坏/攻击行为等YMRS核心项目评分≤2。

结果

接受喹硫平治疗的患者(n = 208)和接受安慰剂治疗的患者(n = 195)入组时YMRS平均评分分别为33.3±6.3和33.5±6.7。与安慰剂相比,喹硫平在第21天(48.1%对31.3%;p<0.001)和第84天(66.8%对40.0%;p<0.001)的有效率显著更高。在第21天,喹硫平单药治疗与安慰剂相比的缓解/心境正常率分别为:37.5%对23.1%(YMRS≤12),35.6%对21.5%(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤10),35.1%对20.0%(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤8),25.0%对14.4%(YMRS≤8),以及21.6%对14.4%(YMRS≤8加上核心项目≤2)(除YMRS≤8加上核心项目≤2外,所有比较p<0.01:p = 0.06)。到第84天,这些比率分别增至:65.4%对35.9%(YMRS≤12),60.1%对30.8%(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤10),58.7%对29.7%(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤8),60.1%对30.3%(YMRS≤8),以及56.7%对29.7%(YMRS≤8加上核心项目≤2)(所有比较p<0.001)。在第21天,有效患者的喹硫平平均日剂量为575毫克/天,第84天为598毫克/天。喹硫平总体耐受性良好。

结论

在3周和12周结束时,对于急性躁狂患者,与安慰剂相比,使用多数标准时,喹硫平的有效率以及缓解/心境正常率显著更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验