Ketter Terence A, Jones Martin, Paulsson Björn
Stanford University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California 94305-5723, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2007;100 Suppl 1:S45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
To evaluate the effects of quetiapine monotherapy compared with placebo on acute (3-week) and more sustained (12-week) rates of response and remission/euthymia in bipolar disorder patients with acute mania.
Two similar 12-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies were conducted, with an a priori decision to combine the data and analyze response and remission rates. Response was measured as a decrease of at least 50% in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores from baseline to Day 21 and Day 84. Five remission/euthymia criteria were employed to determine efficacy at Day 21 and Day 84: (i) YMRS score < or = 12; (ii) YMRS score < or = 12 and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score < or = 10; (iii) YMRS score < or = 12 and MADRS score < or = 8; (iv) YMRS score < or = 8; and (v) YMRS score < or = 8 plus a score < or = 2 for the YMRS core items of Irritability, Speech, Content, and Disruptive/Aggressive Behavior.
Patients treated with quetiapine (n=208) and placebo (n=195) had mean YMRS scores at entry of 33.3+/-6.3 and 33.5+/-6.7, respectively. Significantly higher response rates were observed with quetiapine compared with placebo, at Days 21 (48.1% versus 31.3%; p<0.001) and 84 (66.8% versus 40.0%; p<0.001). At Day 21, remission/euthymia rates with quetiapine monotherapy versus placebo were: 37.5% versus 23.1% (YMRS < or = 12), 35.6% versus 21.5% (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 10), 35.1% versus 20.0% (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 8), 25.0% versus 14.4% (YMRS < or = 8), and 21.6% versus 14.4% (YMRS < or = 8 plus core items < or = 2) (p<0.01 for all comparisons except YMRS < or = 8 plus core items < or = 2: p=0.06). By Day 84, these had increased to: 65.4% versus 35.9% (YMRS < or = 12), 60.1% versus 30.8% (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 10), 58.7% versus 29.7% (YMRS < or = 12+MADRS < or = 8), 60.1% versus 30.3% (YMRS < or = 8), and 56.7% versus 29.7% (YMRS < or = 8 plus core items < or = 2) (p<0.001 for all comparisons). The average daily dose of quetiapine in responders was 575 mg/day at Day 21 and 598 mg/day at Day 84. Quetiapine was generally well tolerated.
Quetiapine was associated with significantly higher response and remission/euthymia rates compared with placebo with most criteria used, in patients with acute mania at the end of both 3 and 12 weeks.
评估喹硫平单药治疗与安慰剂相比,对双相情感障碍急性躁狂患者急性(3周)及更持久(12周)的有效率和缓解/心境正常率的影响。
进行了两项相似的为期12周的多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,事先决定合并数据并分析有效率和缓解率。有效定义为从基线到第21天和第84天,青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)评分至少降低50%。采用五条缓解/心境正常标准来确定第21天和第84天的疗效:(i)YMRS评分≤12;(ii)YMRS评分≤12且蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分≤10;(iii)YMRS评分≤12且MADRS评分≤8;(iv)YMRS评分≤8;(v)YMRS评分≤8加上易激惹、言语、内容及破坏/攻击行为等YMRS核心项目评分≤2。
接受喹硫平治疗的患者(n = 208)和接受安慰剂治疗的患者(n = 195)入组时YMRS平均评分分别为33.3±6.3和33.5±6.7。与安慰剂相比,喹硫平在第21天(48.1%对31.3%;p<0.001)和第84天(66.8%对40.0%;p<0.001)的有效率显著更高。在第21天,喹硫平单药治疗与安慰剂相比的缓解/心境正常率分别为:37.5%对23.1%(YMRS≤12),35.6%对21.5%(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤10),35.1%对20.0%(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤8),25.0%对14.4%(YMRS≤8),以及21.6%对14.4%(YMRS≤8加上核心项目≤2)(除YMRS≤8加上核心项目≤2外,所有比较p<0.01:p = 0.06)。到第84天,这些比率分别增至:65.4%对35.9%(YMRS≤12),60.1%对30.8%(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤10),58.7%对29.7%(YMRS≤12+MADRS≤8),60.1%对30.3%(YMRS≤8),以及56.7%对29.7%(YMRS≤8加上核心项目≤2)(所有比较p<0.001)。在第21天,有效患者的喹硫平平均日剂量为575毫克/天,第84天为598毫克/天。喹硫平总体耐受性良好。
在3周和12周结束时,对于急性躁狂患者,与安慰剂相比,使用多数标准时,喹硫平的有效率以及缓解/心境正常率显著更高。