Behera Madhusmita, Kumar Ambuj, Soares Heloisa P, Sokol Lubomir, Djulbegovic Benjamin
Malignant Hematology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Cancer Control. 2007 Apr;14(2):160-6. doi: 10.1177/107327480701400209.
The randomized, controlled trial (RCT) is the "gold standard" for establishing the effect of any intervention. This approach, however, is often not feasible with rare diseases such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
We review the principles of evidence-based medicine to see which are particularly pertinent to the study of rare diseases.
When an RCT is not feasible, attention is given to determining all the available prior data. Evaluation of the new data and the historic base requires attention to biases, but can allow estimation of a "true" study result.
Even when an RCT cannot be performed because of insufficient cases, utilization of evidence-based methodology can help minimize bias and maximize the truth of observed new data.
随机对照试验(RCT)是确立任何干预措施效果的“金标准”。然而,对于皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤等罕见疾病,这种方法往往不可行。
我们回顾循证医学的原则,以确定哪些原则与罕见疾病的研究特别相关。
当随机对照试验不可行时,需关注确定所有可用的既往数据。对新数据和历史数据基础的评估需要注意偏差,但可以对“真实”的研究结果进行估计。
即使由于病例不足而无法进行随机对照试验,采用循证医学方法也有助于最大限度地减少偏差,并使观察到的新数据的真实性最大化。