Abrahamyan Lusine, Feldman Brian M, Tomlinson George, Faughnan Marie E, Johnson Sindhu R, Diamond Ivan R, Gupta Samir
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2016 Dec;172(4):313-331. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31533. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
Evidence-based medicine requires strong scientific evidence upon which to base treatment. In rare diseases, study populations are often small, and thus this evidence is difficult to accrue. Investigators, though, should be creative and develop a flexible toolkit of methods to deal with the problems inherent in the study of rare disease. This narrative review presents alternative clinical trial designs for studying treatments of rare diseases, including cross-over and n-of-1 trials, randomized placebo-phase design, enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal design, and classes of adaptive designs. Examples of applications of these designs are presented along with their advantages and disadvantages. Additional analytical considerations such as Bayesian analysis, internal pilots, and use of biomarkers as surrogate outcomes are further discussed. A framework for selecting appropriate clinical trial design is proposed to guide investigators in the process of selecting alternative designs for rare diseases. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
循证医学需要强有力的科学证据来作为治疗的依据。在罕见病领域,研究人群往往规模较小,因此很难积累这样的证据。不过,研究人员应发挥创造力,开发一套灵活的方法工具包,以应对罕见病研究中固有的问题。本叙述性综述介绍了用于研究罕见病治疗方法的替代临床试验设计,包括交叉试验和单病例试验、随机安慰剂阶段设计、富集入组、随机撤药设计以及各类适应性设计。文中给出了这些设计的应用实例及其优缺点。还进一步讨论了其他分析考量因素,如贝叶斯分析、内部预试验以及将生物标志物用作替代结局指标等。本文提出了一个选择合适临床试验设计的框架,以指导研究人员在为罕见病选择替代设计的过程中做出决策。© 2016威利期刊公司