Czobor Pál, Jaeger Judith, Berns Stefanie M, Gonzalez Cristina, Loftus Shay
DOV Pharmaceutical Inc., Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Feb-Mar;9(1-2):71-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00428.x.
While neurocognitive (NC) impairments have been well documented in schizophrenia (SZ), there is limited data as to whether similar impairments are present in other persistent mental illnesses. Recent data indicate that NC impairments may be manifested in bipolar disorder (BPD) and that they persist across disease states, including euthymia. An important question is whether a comparable structure of NC impairments is present in the 2 diagnostic groups.
In a previous factor analytic study, we identified 6 factors to describe the basic underlying structure of neuropsychological (NP) functioning in SZ: Attention, Working Memory, Learning, Verbal Knowledge, Non-Verbal Functions, Ideational Fluency. The goal of this study was to investigate whether this factor structure is generalizable for BPD.
The BPD sample included patients (n = 155) from an ongoing longitudinal study evaluating BPD at the time of hospitalization for relapse and at multiple time points over the following 2 years. The SZ sample included patients (n = 250) from a 3-year study. For the current examination the baseline NP evaluations were selected for both samples.
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in the BPD sample yielded factors similar to those identified in the SZ sample. The coefficients of congruence ranged between 0.66-0.90 for the individual factors, indicating a good overall correspondence between the factor structures in the 2 diagnostic groups. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis with education level, full scale-IQ, gender and ethnicity as covariates indicated that SZ patients had markedly worse performance on the Attention and Non-Verbal Functioning factors compared to the BPD patients.
Together, these data suggest that while the same underlying factor structure describes NP functioning in both groups, the profile of impairments appears to vary with the diagnosis.
虽然精神分裂症(SZ)患者的神经认知(NC)障碍已有充分记录,但关于其他持续性精神疾病是否存在类似障碍的数据有限。近期数据表明,双相情感障碍(BPD)患者可能存在NC障碍,且这些障碍在包括心境正常期在内的不同疾病状态下持续存在。一个重要问题是,这两个诊断组的NC障碍结构是否具有可比性。
在之前的一项因素分析研究中,我们确定了6个因素来描述SZ患者神经心理学(NP)功能的基本潜在结构:注意力、工作记忆、学习、语言知识、非语言功能、思维流畅性。本研究的目的是调查这种因素结构是否适用于BPD。
BPD样本包括来自一项正在进行的纵向研究的患者(n = 155),该研究在患者因病情复发住院时以及随后2年的多个时间点对BPD进行评估。SZ样本包括来自一项为期3年研究的患者(n = 250)。对于本次检查,选取了两个样本的基线NP评估结果。
BPD样本的探索性和验证性因素分析得出的因素与SZ样本中确定的因素相似。各个因素的一致性系数在0.66 - 0.90之间,表明两个诊断组的因素结构总体对应良好。以教育水平、全量表智商、性别和种族作为协变量的协方差分析(ANCOVA)表明,与BPD患者相比,SZ患者在注意力和非语言功能因素上的表现明显更差。
总体而言,这些数据表明,虽然相同的潜在因素结构描述了两组患者的NP功能,但障碍特征似乎因诊断而异。