Bralet M C, Navarre M, Eskenazi A M, Lucas-Ross M, Falissard B
Service de psychiatrie, CHI de Clermont-de-l'Oise, Clermont-de-l'Oise, France.
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
An increasing interest in the study of cognition in Schizophrenia has developed within the last few years although cognitive problems have been described in this disorder since the beginning of the 20th century. Presently, various data tend to assert that cognitive disorders are the core disturbance in schizophrenia and that their severity is predictive of the course of the disease. Indeed, studies have shown that the disturbances measured in cognitive tests are neither the consequences of positive or negative symptoms, nor related to motivation or global intellectual deficit, nor to anti-psychotic medication. It is also presently known that the severity of cognitive symptoms is a better indicator of social and functional outcome than the severity of the negative or positive symptoms. The patients who have the most severe cognitive deficits during the first episode of the disease are most likely to present a chronic and severe form later on. The aspects of cognition that are specifically impaired in schizophrenia are verbal memory, working memory, motor function, attention, executive functions, and verbal fluency. Cognitive disturbances are thus very important in several fields of research in schizophrenia such as: understanding the psychopathology, epidemiology (indicators of vulnerability), genetics (endophenotypes), neuro-imaging (including functional neuro-imaging), and psychopharmacology (they can be used as a parameter of evaluation in therapeutic trials with new molecules, or cognitive psychotherapy). LIMITS OF COGNITION ASSESSMENTS: However, there are some methodological limits to these cognitive evaluations. First, schizophrenia is a heterogeneous disease and there are no specificities of the different subgroups in terms of cognition. Secondly, the time chosen to evaluate the abilities of the patient is also a limiting factor. But most of all, the batteries of tests used in different studies are not standardized. BRIEF ASSESSMENT OF COGNITION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: It is therefore of great interest to create an available and easily used battery of validated tests. This would enable one to measure the different cognitive deficits and to repeat the tests, and assess evolution through longitudinal follow up of the patients. The BACS is a new instrument developed by Keefe et al. in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences at the University of Duke Medical Centre. It evaluates the cognitive dimensions specifically altered in schizophrenia and correlated with the evolution of the disease. This test is simple to use, requiring only paper, pencils and a stopwatch. It can be administered by different carers. The duration of the test session is approximately 35min. This battery of tests was validated on a sample of 150 patients compared with a sample of 50 controls, matched for age, parent education and ethnic groups. This aim of this study is to create a French adaptation of the BACS (translation and back translation approved by the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences at the University of Duke Medical Centre) and then to test its easiness of administration and its sensitivity, performing correlation analysis between the French Version of the BACS (version A) and a standard battery. Its adaptation and validation in French would at first be useful for the French-speaking areas and then would add some new data for the pertinence of using the BACS.
35 French stabilized schizophrenic patients were recruited from the inpatient and outpatient facilities at the Clermont-de-L'Oise Mental Health Hospital (Picardie area, France) in Dr Boitard's Psychiatric Department (FJ 5.) Patients were required to meet DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective illness. The patients were tested on two separate days by two independent clinicians with less than two weeks between the two assessments. During the first test session, subjects received the French A version of the BACS and during the second session, they were administered the standard battery of cognitive tests including: the Rey Auditory-Verbal learning test, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, third edition, subtests (Digit inverse sequencing, Digit Symbol-Coding), the Trail-Making A, Verbal Fluency (Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Category Instances), and the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (128 card version). The factor structure of the French BACS A Version was determined by performing a principal components analysis with oblique rotation. The relationship between the French BACS sub-scores and the standard battery sub-scores was determined by calculating Pearson's correlations among the sub-scores, with a level of significance of alpha<0.05.
All the 35 patients completed the standard battery and each subtest of the French BACS A Version without interruption and with good understanding of the instructions. The average duration of the BACS test sessions was 36.51min (S.D.=12.14.) compared to the standard battery in which the sessions lasted more than one hour with more difficulty during the Wisconsin tests. The factor analysis conducted on the data collected from patients suggests that there is a single dimension, a factor of general cognitive performance, which accounted for the greatest amount of variance. The BACS thus permits an assessment of overall cognitive function as a global score, more than some individual specific cognitive domains. The sub-scores from the French BACS A Version were strongly correlated with the standard battery corresponding sub-scores. We observed significant correlations for all the subtests evaluating: verbal memory (Pearson=0.83; p<0.001; IC [0.69; 0.91]), working memory (Pearson=0.67; p<0.001; IC[0.43; 0.80]), verbal fluency (semantic: Pearson=0.64; p<0.001; IC[0.40; 0.80]), alphabetical (Pearson=0.87; p<0.001;IC[0.77; 0.93]), attention and speed of information processing (Pearson=0.69; p<0.001; IC[0.47; 0.83]), executive function (Pearson=0.64; p<0.001; IC[0.39; 0.80]). We almost found a significant correlation for motor speed (Pearson=-0. 32; p=0.06; IC [-0.59; -0.014]).
The French adaptation of the BACS scale is easier to use in schizophrenic patients with French as mother tongue, with a completion rate equal to 1, and also with less than 35min to complete and check. We obtained significant correlations for all domains except motor speed, which is almost significant. The BACS is as sensitive to cognitive impairment in patients with schizophrenia as a standard battery of tests that required over 2h to complete. Moreover, these results demonstrate that the BACS, the global score of which may be the most powerful indicator of functional outcome, can also be a good neuropsychological instrument for assessing global cognition in patients with schizophrenia.
尽管自20世纪初就已发现精神分裂症存在认知问题,但在过去几年中,对精神分裂症认知的研究兴趣与日俱增。目前,各种数据倾向于表明认知障碍是精神分裂症的核心干扰因素,其严重程度可预测疾病进程。事实上,研究表明,认知测试中测得的干扰既不是阳性或阴性症状的后果,也与动机、整体智力缺陷或抗精神病药物无关。目前还知道,认知症状的严重程度比阴性或阳性症状的严重程度更能准确反映社会和功能结果。在疾病首发时存在最严重认知缺陷的患者,日后更有可能发展为慢性重度形式。精神分裂症中特别受损的认知方面包括言语记忆、工作记忆、运动功能、注意力、执行功能和言语流畅性。因此认知障碍在精神分裂症的几个研究领域中非常重要,例如:理解精神病理学、流行病学(易感性指标)、遗传学(内表型)、神经影像学(包括功能神经影像学)和精神药理学(在新分子治疗试验或认知心理治疗中,它们可作为评估参数)。
然而,这些认知评估存在一些方法学上的局限性。首先,精神分裂症是一种异质性疾病,不同亚组在认知方面没有特异性。其次,选择评估患者能力的时间也是一个限制因素。但最重要的是,不同研究中使用的测试组合并不标准化。
因此,创建一套可用且易于使用的经过验证的测试组合非常有意义。这将使人们能够测量不同的认知缺陷,重复测试,并通过对患者的纵向随访评估病情进展。BACS是杜克大学医学中心精神病学和行为科学系的Keefe等人开发的一种新工具。它评估精神分裂症中特别改变且与疾病进展相关的认知维度。该测试使用简单,仅需纸、铅笔和秒表。可由不同护理人员进行测试。测试时间约为35分钟。该测试组合在150名患者样本和50名年龄、父母教育程度和种族匹配的对照组样本上进行了验证。本研究的目的是创建BACS的法语版本(翻译和回译经杜克大学医学中心精神病学和行为科学系批准),然后测试其易用性和敏感性,对法语版BACS(A版)与标准测试组合进行相关性分析。其法语版的改编和验证首先将造福于法语地区,然后将为使用BACS的相关性提供一些新数据。
从法国皮卡第地区奥伊斯河畔克莱蒙精神卫生医院(Dr Boitard精神病科,FJ 5)的住院和门诊设施中招募了35名病情稳定的法国精神分裂症患者。患者需符合DSM-IV精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍标准。患者在两天内由两名独立临床医生进行测试,两次评估间隔不到两周。在第一次测试中,受试者接受法语A版BACS测试,在第二次测试中,他们接受标准认知测试组合,包括:雷伊听觉-言语学习测试、韦氏成人智力量表第三版分测验(数字倒序序列、数字符号编码)、连线测验A、言语流畅性(受控口语单词联想测验类别实例)和威斯康星卡片分类测验(128张卡片版本)。通过进行带有斜交旋转的主成分分析来确定法语BACS A版的因子结构。通过计算各分测验分数之间的皮尔逊相关性来确定法语BACS分测验分数与标准测试组合分测验分数之间的关系,显著性水平为α<0.05。
所有35名患者均完成了标准测试组合以及法语BACS A版的每个子测验,且测试过程未中断,对测试说明理解良好。BACS测试的平均时长为36.51分钟(标准差=12.14),而标准测试组合的测试时长超过一小时,且在威斯康星测试中难度更大。对患者收集的数据进行的因子分析表明,存在一个单一维度,即一般认知表现因子,其解释了最大比例的方差。因此,BACS允许将整体认知功能评估为一个总体分数,而不仅仅是某些特定的个体认知领域。法语BACS A版的子测验分数与标准测试组合相应的子测验分数高度相关。我们观察到,在评估言语记忆(皮尔逊=0.83;p<0.001;置信区间[0.69;0.91])、工作记忆(皮尔逊=0.67;p<0.001;置信区间[0.43;0.80])、言语流畅性(语义:皮尔逊=0.64;p<0.001;置信区间[0.40;0.80])、字母顺序(皮尔逊=0.87;p<0.001;置信区间[0.77;0.93])、注意力和信息处理速度(皮尔逊=0.69;p<0.001;置信区间[0.47;0.83])、执行功能(皮尔逊=0.64;p<0.001;置信区间[0.39;0.80])的所有子测验中均存在显著相关性。我们几乎发现运动速度存在显著相关性(皮尔逊=-0.32;p=0.06;置信区间[-0.59;-0.014])。
对于以法语为母语的精神分裂症患者,法语版BACS量表更易于使用,完成率为100%,完成并检查时间不到35分钟。除运动速度外,所有领域均获得显著相关性,运动速度几乎具有显著性。BACS对精神分裂症患者认知损害的敏感性与需耗时2小时以上才能完成的标准测试组合相当。此外,这些结果表明,BACS的总体分数可能是功能结果的最有力指标,它也可以成为评估精神分裂症患者整体认知的良好神经心理学工具。