Grim Patrick
Group for Logic and Formal Semantics, Department of Philosophy, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(2):183-201. doi: 10.1002/bsl.747.
Philosophical work on free will is inevitably framed by the problem of free will and determinism. This paper offers an overview of the current state of the philosophical art. Early sections focus on quantum indeterminism, an outline of the most influential logical argument for incompatibilism between free will and determinism, and telling problems that face incompatibilism. A major portion of the paper focuses on the compatiblist alternative, favored by many working philosophers. The conditional account of free will offered by classical compatibilism can be shown to be inadequate. A number of compatibilist options remain open, however, and seem promising for future research. These include "hierarchical" or "mesh" accounts of free will, normative perspectives and an approach to free will in terms of an emphasis on context. Final sections draw out the implications of contemporary compatibilism for the brain and behavioral sciences and for the law.
关于自由意志的哲学著作不可避免地受到自由意志与决定论问题的影响。本文概述了当前哲学领域的现状。开头部分聚焦于量子不确定性、自由意志与决定论不相容论最具影响力的逻辑论证概述,以及不相容论面临的显著问题。本文的主要部分聚焦于许多在职哲学家所青睐的相容论替代方案。经典相容论提出的自由意志条件性解释已被证明是不充分的。然而,一些相容论选项仍然可行,并且对未来研究似乎很有前景。这些选项包括自由意志的“层级”或“网状”解释、规范性视角以及强调情境的自由意志研究方法。最后部分阐述了当代相容论对大脑与行为科学以及法律的影响。