Evans Rhodri, Edwards Adrian G K, Elwyn Glyn, Watson Eila, Grol Richard, Brett Jo, Austoker Joan
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff.
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Apr;57(537):303-10.
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing in primary care is an important and contentious issue. Due to concerns about the test and the value of early detection, countries such as the UK advocate 'informed choice' instead of population screening. It is not known whether this policy is actually adhered to in primary care. Furthermore, little is known of the experiences of men who face this decision.
To explore the experiences, understanding, and views of men who considered or undertook PSA testing in UK primary care.
Qualitative interview-based study.
Primary care, Wales, UK.
Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with 28 men, representing a range of clinical outcomes. Transcripts were coded and subjected to thematic analysis.
Three themes were identified: the decision-making context, the locus of decision making, and uncertainty related to the PSA test.
The decision to undertake PSA testing was affected by both social and media factors and it did not appear to be a patient-led decision. The decision created considerable uncertainty for men and this uncertainty persisted after the test, even if the result was normal. Raised PSA led to further investigations and this exacerbated the uncertainty. Anxiety and regret were consequences of this uncertainty.
基层医疗中前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测是一个重要且存在争议的问题。由于对该检测及其早期检测价值的担忧,英国等国家提倡“知情选择”而非人群筛查。目前尚不清楚基层医疗中是否实际遵循了这一政策。此外,对于面临这一决策的男性的经历知之甚少。
探讨在英国基层医疗中考虑或进行PSA检测的男性的经历、理解和观点。
基于定性访谈的研究。
英国威尔士的基层医疗。
对28名男性进行了半结构化一对一访谈,这些男性代表了一系列临床结果。对访谈记录进行编码并进行主题分析。
确定了三个主题:决策背景、决策地点以及与PSA检测相关的不确定性。
进行PSA检测的决策受到社会和媒体因素的影响,似乎并非由患者主导。该决策给男性带来了相当大的不确定性,即使检测结果正常,这种不确定性在检测后仍持续存在。PSA升高会导致进一步检查,这加剧了不确定性。焦虑和遗憾是这种不确定性的后果。