Graf D, Schlaepfer J, Gollut E, van Melle G, Mischler C, Fromer M, Kappenberger L, Pruvot E
Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, BH07, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 24;123(3):249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
The investigation of unexplained syncope remains a challenging clinical problem. In the present study we sought to evaluate the diagnostic value of a standardized work-up focusing on non invasive tests in patients with unexplained syncope referred to a syncope clinic, and whether certain combinations of clinical parameters are characteristic of rhythmic and reflex causes of syncope.
317 consecutive patients underwent a standardized work-up including a 12-lead ECG, physical examination, detailed history with screening for syncope-related symptoms using a structured questionnaire followed by carotid sinus massage (CSM), and head-up tilt test. Invasive testings including an electrophysiological study and implantation of a loop recorder were only performed in those with structural heart disease or traumatic syncope. Our work-up identified an etiology in 81% of the patients. Importantly, three quarters of the causes were established non invasively combining head-up tilt test, CSM and hyperventilation testing. Invasive tests yielded an additional 7% of diagnoses. Logistic analysis identified age and number of significant prodromes as the only predictive factors of rhythmic syncope. The same two factors, in addition to the duration of the ECG P-wave, were also predictive of vasovagal and psychogenic syncope. These factors, optimally combined in predictive models, showed a high negative and a modest positive predictive value.
A standardized work-up focusing on non invasive tests allows to establish more than three quarters of syncope causes. Predictive models based on simple clinical parameters may help to distinguish between rhythmic and other causes of syncope.
不明原因晕厥的调查仍然是一个具有挑战性的临床问题。在本研究中,我们试图评估针对转诊至晕厥门诊的不明原因晕厥患者进行以无创检查为主的标准化检查流程的诊断价值,以及某些临床参数组合是否为晕厥的节律性和反射性病因所特有。
317例连续患者接受了标准化检查流程,包括12导联心电图、体格检查、使用结构化问卷详细询问病史并筛查晕厥相关症状,随后进行颈动脉窦按摩(CSM)和直立倾斜试验。仅对患有结构性心脏病或创伤性晕厥的患者进行包括电生理检查和植入环路记录仪在内的侵入性检查。我们的检查流程在81%的患者中确定了病因。重要的是,四分之三的病因是通过联合直立倾斜试验、CSM和过度通气试验等无创方法确定的。侵入性检查又额外得出了7%的诊断结果。逻辑分析确定年龄和显著前驱症状的数量是节律性晕厥的唯一预测因素。除了心电图P波持续时间外,这两个因素也是血管迷走性和心因性晕厥的预测因素。这些因素在预测模型中进行最佳组合时,显示出较高的阴性预测价值和适度的阳性预测价值。
以无创检查为主的标准化检查流程能够确定超过四分之三的晕厥病因。基于简单临床参数的预测模型可能有助于区分晕厥的节律性病因和其他病因。