Van Horn K R, Levine M J, Curtis C L
Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant 48859.
Brain Inj. 1992 Jan-Feb;6(1):15-28. doi: 10.3109/02699059209008118.
Ten adults, who had sustained a closed head injury, were interviewed regarding their self-understanding, concepts of persons, and interpersonal negotiation strategies. Responses were evaluated in terms of developmental levels of social cognition. Levels of interpersonal negotiation strategies were significantly lower than levels of self-understanding, descriptions of psychological characteristics of self were at a significantly higher level than descriptions of active and physical characteristics of self. Within interpersonal conflict situations, proposed solutions were at a significantly lower level than the justifications offered for the solutions. In general, developmental levels of social cognition were comparable to levels exhibited by non-clinical samples of adolescents. The two areas in which the head-injury patients appeared to perform at a significantly higher level than adolescents were their justifications for their proposed solutions to the interpersonal conflict situations and their ability to express the emotional consequences of interpersonal conflict.
对十名闭合性头部受伤的成年人就他们的自我理解、人格概念和人际协商策略进行了访谈。根据社会认知的发展水平对回答进行了评估。人际协商策略的水平显著低于自我理解的水平，对自我心理特征的描述显著高于对自我主动和身体特征的描述。在人际冲突情境中，提出的解决方案的水平显著低于为这些解决方案提供的理由。总体而言，社会认知的发展水平与青少年非临床样本所表现出的水平相当。头部受伤患者表现明显高于青少年的两个方面是他们对人际冲突情境中提出的解决方案的理由以及表达人际冲突情感后果的能力。
