• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Community consultation and engagement in health care reform.

作者信息

McBride Tony, Korczak Viola

机构信息

Health Issues Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Melbourne.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 1:S13-5. doi: 10.1071/ah070s13.

DOI:10.1071/ah070s13
PMID:17402899
Abstract

In advocating for significant reform of the health care system, the Australian Health Care Reform Alliance (AHCRA) supports a process of citizen engagement that will allow the wider community to have a say in the future direction of their health care system. Models that have engaged community opinions have been successful overseas, and this article calls for similar processes in Australia.

摘要

相似文献

1
Community consultation and engagement in health care reform.
Aust Health Rev. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 1:S13-5. doi: 10.1071/ah070s13.
2
Can mental health commissions really drive reform? Towards better resourcing, services, accountability and stakeholder engagement.心理健康委员会真的能推动改革吗?迈向更充足的资源、更好的服务、更强的问责制以及更多的利益相关者参与。
Australas Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;20(3):193-8. doi: 10.1177/1039856212447860. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
3
Divisions of general practice: a status review.全科医学的分科:现状综述
Aust Health Rev. 1995;18(4):78-94. doi: 10.1071/ah950078.
4
A review of community consultation in the development of a multi purpose service in rural and remote Australia.澳大利亚农村和偏远地区多用途服务发展中的社区咨询综述。
Aust Health Rev. 2004;28(1):97-104. doi: 10.1071/ah040097.
5
"Community" as the ideal for health care reform.“社区”作为医疗保健改革的理想目标。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Feb;22(1):231-43. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-1-231.
6
Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making.社区对公众参与卫生技术评估决策的看法和观点。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):68-74. doi: 10.1071/AH15221.
7
Citizen participation in the reform of health care policy: a case example.公民参与医疗保健政策改革:一个案例
Healthc Manage Forum. 1996 Summer;9(2):31-5. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60850-2.
8
Agenda-setting in health reform: the role of community.
Aust Health Rev. 2001;24(1):161-5. doi: 10.1071/ah010161.
9
Community health: beyond care for individuals.社区卫生:超越个体护理
Soc Policy. 1994 Summer;24(4):52-62.
10
Community and consumer participation in Australian health services--an overview of organisational commitment and participation processes.澳大利亚医疗服务中的社区与消费者参与——组织承诺与参与过程概述
Aust Health Rev. 2000;23(3):113-21. doi: 10.1071/ah000113a.

引用本文的文献

1
Public preferences regarding the priority setting criteria of health interventions for budget allocation: results of a survey of Iranian adults.公众对健康干预措施预算分配的优先顺序设定标准的偏好:对伊朗成年人调查的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):2038. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14404-1.
2
Italian Consensus Statement on Patient Engagement in Chronic Care: Process and Outcomes.意大利关于患者参与慢性病护理的共识声明:过程和结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 11;17(11):4167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114167.
3
Is a Transdisciplinary Theory of Engagement in Organized Settings Possible? A Concept Analysis of the Literature on Employee Engagement, Consumer Engagement and Patient Engagement.
是否有可能形成一种关于在有组织环境中参与的跨学科理论?对员工参与、消费者参与和患者参与相关文献的概念分析。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 6;8:872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00872. eCollection 2017.
4
Community Preferences for the Allocation & Donation of Organs--the PAraDOx Study.社区对器官分配与捐赠的偏好——PAraDOx 研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 25;11:386. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-386.
5
Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development.运用审议技巧让社区参与政策制定。
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2008 Jul 16;5:16. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-5-16.