Bell Erica
University Department of Rural Health, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 103, Hobart, TAS.
Aust Health Rev. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 1:S86-97. doi: 10.1071/ah070s86.
This paper aims to provide hospital administrators and others making decisions about hospital error funding, as well as researchers, with information about what good hospital error research looks like. It offers a selective review of how the error literature has approached hospital error, which is used to develop five criteria for sound hospital error research. It also explores the potential for better hospital error research of quali-quantitative analysis (QQA), an innovative social sciences research method. In a context in which other methodologies all have their shortcomings, QQA appears to go some way toward meeting the five criteria for sound hospital error research. Ideally, QQA would be used in combination with other approaches to answer the kinds of questions that are important to hospital administrators when they are faced with high-stakes error evaluation situations.
本文旨在为医院管理人员以及其他负责医院医疗差错资金决策的人员,还有研究人员,提供有关优质医院医疗差错研究应具备哪些特点的信息。它对差错文献研究医院医疗差错的方式进行了选择性综述,以此来制定五项合理的医院医疗差错研究标准。同时,本文还探讨了定性定量分析(QQA)这种创新的社会科学研究方法在改善医院医疗差错研究方面的潜力。在其他方法均存在缺陷的背景下,QQA似乎在一定程度上满足了五项合理的医院医疗差错研究标准。理想情况下,QQA应与其他方法结合使用,以回答医院管理人员在面临高风险差错评估情况时所关心的重要问题。