• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于使用三种观察性研究设计评估流感疫苗效力的方法学问题。

Methodologic issues regarding the use of three observational study designs to assess influenza vaccine effectiveness.

作者信息

Orenstein Evan W, De Serres Gaston, Haber Michael J, Shay David K, Bridges Carolyn B, Gargiullo Paul, Orenstein Walter A

机构信息

Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;36(3):623-31. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym021. Epub 2007 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dym021
PMID:17403908
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Influenza causes substantial morbidity and annual vaccination is the most important prevention strategy. Accurately measuring vaccine effectiveness (VE) is difficult. The clinical syndrome most closely associated with influenza virus infection, influenza-like illness (ILI), is not specific. In addition, laboratory confirmation is infrequently done, and available rapid diagnostic tests are imperfect. The objective of this study was to estimate the joint impact of rapid diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity on VE for three types of study designs: a cohort study, a traditional case-control study, and a case-control study that used as controls individuals with ILI who tested negative for influenza virus infection.

METHODS

We developed a mathematical model with five input parameters: true VE, attack rates (ARs) of influenza-ILI and non-influenza-ILI and the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test.

RESULTS

With imperfect specificity, estimates from all three designs tended to underestimate true VE, but were similar except if fairly extreme inputs were used. Only if test specificity was 95% or more or if influenza attack rates doubled that of background illness did the case-control method slightly overestimate VE. The case-control method usually produced the highest and most accurate estimates, followed by the test-negative design. The bias toward underestimating true VE introduced by low test specificity increased as the AR of influenza- relative to non-influenza-ILI decreases and, to a lesser degree, with lower test sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Demonstration of a high influenza VE using tests with imperfect sensitivity and specificity should provide reassurance that the program has been effective in reducing influenza illnesses, assuming adequate control of confounding factors.

摘要

背景

流感会导致大量发病情况,每年接种疫苗是最重要的预防策略。准确测量疫苗效力(VE)具有难度。与流感病毒感染最密切相关的临床综合征,即流感样疾病(ILI),并不具有特异性。此外,很少进行实验室确诊,且现有的快速诊断测试并不完美。本研究的目的是估计快速诊断测试的敏感性和特异性对三种研究设计的疫苗效力的联合影响:队列研究、传统病例对照研究以及将流感病毒感染检测呈阴性的ILI患者作为对照的病例对照研究。

方法

我们开发了一个具有五个输入参数的数学模型:真实疫苗效力、流感ILI和非流感ILI的发病率(ARs)以及诊断测试的敏感性和特异性。

结果

在特异性不完美的情况下,所有三种设计的估计值往往会低估真实疫苗效力,但除了使用相当极端的输入值外,这些估计值相似。只有当测试特异性为95%或更高,或者流感发病率是背景疾病发病率的两倍时,病例对照方法才会略微高估疫苗效力。病例对照方法通常产生最高且最准确的估计值,其次是检测阴性设计。随着流感相对于非流感ILI的发病率降低,以及在较小程度上随着测试敏感性降低,低测试特异性导致的低估真实疫苗效力的偏差会增加。

结论

假设对混杂因素进行了充分控制,使用敏感性和特异性不完美的测试证明高流感疫苗效力应能让人放心该计划在减少流感疾病方面是有效的。

相似文献

1
Methodologic issues regarding the use of three observational study designs to assess influenza vaccine effectiveness.关于使用三种观察性研究设计评估流感疫苗效力的方法学问题。
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;36(3):623-31. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym021. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
2
Estimating vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed influenza using a sentinel physician network: results from the 2005-2006 season of dual A and B vaccine mismatch in Canada.利用哨点医生网络评估针对实验室确诊流感的疫苗效力:加拿大2005 - 2006年甲乙型流感疫苗双重错配季节的结果
Vaccine. 2007 Apr 12;25(15):2842-51. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Oct 16.
3
A nested case-control study of influenza vaccination was a cost-effective alternative to a full cohort analysis.一项关于流感疫苗接种的巢式病例对照研究是全队列分析具有成本效益的替代方案。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Sep;57(9):875-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.019.
4
Influence of clinical case definitions with differing levels of sensitivity and specificity on estimates of the relative and absolute health benefits of influenza vaccination among healthy working adults and implications for economic analyses.具有不同敏感性和特异性水平的临床病例定义对健康在职成年人流感疫苗接种相对和绝对健康益处估计的影响及其对经济分析的意义。
Virus Res. 2004 Jul;103(1-2):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.005.
5
Interim within-season estimate of the effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine--Marshfield, Wisconsin, 2007-08 influenza season.三价灭活流感疫苗有效性的季节内中期估计——威斯康星州马什菲尔德,2007 - 2008年流感季节
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Apr 18;57(15):393-8.
6
Effects of imperfect test sensitivity and specificity on observational studies of influenza vaccine effectiveness.不完全的检测敏感性和特异性对流感疫苗有效性观察性研究的影响。
Vaccine. 2015 Mar 10;33(11):1313-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.069. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
Effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines varied substantially with antigenic match from the 2004-2005 season to the 2006-2007 season.从2004 - 2005年流感季节到2006 - 2007年流感季节,灭活流感疫苗的有效性因抗原匹配程度不同而有很大差异。
J Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 15;199(2):159-67. doi: 10.1086/595861.
8
Burden of influenza-like illness and effectiveness of influenza vaccination among working adults aged 50-64 years.50至64岁在职成年人中流感样疾病负担及流感疫苗接种效果
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 1;48(3):292-8. doi: 10.1086/595842.
9
Magnitude of potential biases in a simulated case-control study of the effectiveness of influenza vaccination.流感疫苗有效性模拟病例对照研究中潜在偏倚的幅度。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 1;54(1):25-32. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir750. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
10
New strategies are needed to improve the accuracy of influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates among seniors.需要新的策略来提高老年人流感疫苗有效性估计的准确性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;62(7):687-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.014. Epub 2009 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
RANDOMIZATION INFERENCE FOR CLUSTER-RANDOMIZED TEST-NEGATIVE DESIGNS WITH APPLICATION TO DENGUE STUDIES: UNBIASED ESTIMATION, PARTIAL COMPLIANCE, AND STEPPED-WEDGE DESIGN.用于登革热研究的整群随机试验阴性设计的随机化推断:无偏估计、部分依从性和阶梯楔形设计
Ann Appl Stat. 2023 Jun;17(2):1592-1614. doi: 10.1214/22-aoas1684. Epub 2023 May 1.
2
Effectiveness of cell culture-based influenza vaccine, 2023-2024.基于细胞培养的流感疫苗的有效性,2023 - 2024年
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piaf069.
3
Power and sample size considerations for test-negative design with bias correction: a case study on the world first malaria vaccine.
带有偏差校正的检验阴性设计的功效和样本量考量:以世界上首个疟疾疫苗为例的研究
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02628-9.
4
Evaluating the Test-Negative Design for COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Using Randomized Trial Data: A Secondary Cross-Protocol Analysis of 5 Randomized Clinical Trials.利用随机试验数据评估COVID-19疫苗有效性的检测阴性设计:5项随机临床试验的二次交叉方案分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2512763. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12763.
5
Test-Negative Designs with Multiple Testing Sources.具有多个测试源的阴性测试设计。
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 29:rs.3.rs-6548614. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6548614/v1.
6
Test-Negative Designs with Multiple Testing Sources.具有多个测试源的阴性测试设计。
medRxiv. 2025 Apr 28:2025.04.26.25326477. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.26.25326477.
7
Effectiveness of EV-A71 Vaccine and Its Impact on the Incidence of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease: A Systematic Review.肠道病毒71型疫苗的有效性及其对手足口病发病率的影响:一项系统评价
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Sep 8;12(9):1028. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12091028.
8
Estimation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against infections and severe outcomes using routine surveillance data in Kosovo, July-September 2021.利用 2021 年 7 月至 9 月科索沃常规监测数据估计 COVID-19 疫苗对感染和重症结局的有效性。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 24;19(7):e0305629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305629. eCollection 2024.
9
Hypothesis testing and sample size considerations for the test-negative design.假设检验和阴性设计的样本量考虑。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02277-4.
10
Effectiveness of the Sanofi/GSK (VidPrevtyn Beta) and Pfizer-BioNTech (Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5) bivalent vaccines against hospitalisation in England.赛诺菲/葛兰素史克(维德Prevtyn Beta)和辉瑞-生物科技(原始/奥密克戎BA.4-5二价疫苗Comirnaty)二价疫苗在英格兰预防住院的有效性。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Apr 10;71:102587. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102587. eCollection 2024 May.