• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺特异性抗原水平作为致命性前列腺癌的预测指标

Prostate-specific antigen levels as a predictor of lethal prostate cancer.

作者信息

Fall Katja, Garmo Hans, Andrén Ove, Bill-Axelson Anna, Adolfsson Jan, Adami Hans-Olov, Johansson Jan-Erik, Holmberg Lars

机构信息

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Apr 4;99(7):526-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk110.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djk110
PMID:17405997
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rates of long-term survival among patients with untreated localized prostate cancer are high. To avoid unnecessary treatment, tools are needed to identify the small proportion of patients who are destined to develop lethal prostate cancer.

METHODS

To evaluate the accuracy of early changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as predictors of prostate cancer outcome, we assessed serial measurements of PSA level among 267 men with localized prostate cancer in a Scandinavian cohort of men who were diagnosed between 1989 and 1999 and who were managed by watchful waiting. We then 1) fitted individual regression lines to the PSA values assessed for each patient during the first 2 years of follow-up by using three different models, 2) evaluated early PSA curve characteristics as determinants of the cumulative incidence of lethal prostate cancer and calculated hazard ratios for baseline PSA value and rate of change in PSA level to prostate cancer outcome, and 3) plotted time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. All P values are two-sided.

RESULTS

During complete follow-up for a mean of 8.5 years, 34 patients (13%) died from prostate cancer, and 18 (7%) developed metastases but were still alive at end of follow-up. In a log-linear model, both PSA value at baseline (P = .05) and the rate of PSA change (P<.001) were associated with the development of lethal prostate cancer. In the ROC analysis, however, the accuracy of classifying the disease as either indolent or destined to progress was low, regardless of the cut point chosen for initial PSA level or rate of change in PSA level.

CONCLUSIONS

Although baseline PSA value and rate of PSA change are prognostic factors for lethal prostate cancer, they are poor predictors of lethal prostate cancer among patients with localized prostate cancer who are managed by watchful waiting.

摘要

背景

未经治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者的长期生存率很高。为避免不必要的治疗,需要一些工具来识别注定会发展为致命性前列腺癌的一小部分患者。

方法

为了评估前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平早期变化作为前列腺癌预后预测指标的准确性,我们在一个斯堪的纳维亚队列中评估了267例局限性前列腺癌男性患者的PSA水平系列测量值,这些患者于1989年至1999年被诊断,采用观察等待管理。然后我们1)使用三种不同模型为每位患者在随访的前两年评估的PSA值拟合个体回归线,2)评估早期PSA曲线特征作为致命性前列腺癌累积发病率的决定因素,并计算基线PSA值和PSA水平变化率与前列腺癌预后的风险比,3)绘制时间依赖性受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。所有P值均为双侧。

结果

在平均8.5年的完整随访期间,34例患者(13%)死于前列腺癌,18例(7%)发生转移但在随访结束时仍存活。在对数线性模型中,基线时的PSA值(P = 0.05)和PSA变化率(P<0.001)均与致命性前列腺癌的发生相关。然而,在ROC分析中,无论为初始PSA水平或PSA水平变化率选择何种切点,将疾病分类为惰性或注定进展的准确性都很低。

结论

虽然基线PSA值和PSA变化率是致命性前列腺癌的预后因素,但在采用观察等待管理的局限性前列腺癌患者中,它们是致命性前列腺癌的不良预测指标。

相似文献

1
Prostate-specific antigen levels as a predictor of lethal prostate cancer.前列腺特异性抗原水平作为致命性前列腺癌的预测指标
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Apr 4;99(7):526-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk110.
2
Validity of prostate-specific antigen as a tumour marker in men with prostate cancer managed by watchful-waiting: correlation with findings at serial endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging.前列腺特异性抗原作为接受观察等待治疗的前列腺癌男性患者肿瘤标志物的有效性:与系列直肠内磁共振成像和光谱成像结果的相关性
BJU Int. 2007 Jan;99(1):41-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06515.x.
3
Evaluation of changes in prostate specific antigen in clinically localized prostate cancer managed without initial therapy.未经初始治疗的临床局限性前列腺癌中前列腺特异性抗原变化的评估。
J Urol. 1998 Apr;159(4):1243-6.
4
Postradiotherapy 2-year prostate-specific antigen nadir as a predictor of long-term prostate cancer mortality.放疗后2年前列腺特异性抗原最低点作为长期前列腺癌死亡率的预测指标。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Dec 1;75(5):1350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.067. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
5
Early outcomes of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌主动监测的早期结果
BJU Int. 2005 May;95(7):956-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05446.x.
6
The 20-Yr outcome in patients with well- or moderately differentiated clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed in the pre-PSA era: the prognostic value of tumour ploidy and comorbidity.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测时代之前诊断的高分化或中分化临床局限性前列腺癌患者的20年预后:肿瘤倍体和合并症的预后价值
Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1028-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
7
Prostate-cancer-specific survival and clinical progression-free survival in men with prostate cancer treated intermittently with testosterone-inactivating pharmaceuticals.接受睾酮灭活药物间歇性治疗的前列腺癌男性患者的前列腺癌特异性生存率和无临床进展生存率。
Urology. 2007 Sep;70(3):506-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.015.
8
The Prostate cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial:VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy to watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.前列腺癌干预与观察试验:退伍军人事务部/美国国立癌症研究所/医疗保健研究与质量局合作研究项目#407(PIVOT):一项随机对照试验的设计及基线结果,该试验比较了根治性前列腺切除术与对临床局限性前列腺癌男性进行观察等待的效果。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Jan;30(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
9
Temporarily deferred therapy (watchful waiting) for men younger than 70 years and with low-risk localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era.在前列腺特异性抗原时代,对70岁以下且患有低风险局限性前列腺癌的男性进行暂时延迟治疗(观察等待)。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 1;21(21):4001-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.092.
10
After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后,“微小”前列腺癌的进展风险与低风险“显著”癌症相似。
BJU Int. 2008 Jan;101(2):170-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07270.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Urinary MicroRNA-21 for Prostate Cancer Detection Using a Silver Nanoparticle Sensor: A Promising Diagnostic Tool.用于前列腺癌检测的尿微小RNA-21银纳米颗粒传感器:一种有前景的诊断工具。
Biosensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 7;14(12):599. doi: 10.3390/bios14120599.
2
Natural History of Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Managed With Watchful Waiting.观察等待管理的非转移性前列腺癌自然史。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414599. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14599.
3
Long-term Outcomes Among Men Undergoing Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in Sweden.
瑞典接受前列腺癌主动监测的男性的长期结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231015. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31015.
4
Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT.主动监测、根治性前列腺切除术和根治性放疗在 PSA 检测到的局限性前列腺癌中的应用:ProtecT 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Aug;24(37):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24370.
5
The ProtecT trial: analysis of the patient cohort, baseline risk stratification and disease progression.ProtecT 试验:患者队列分析、基线风险分层和疾病进展。
BJU Int. 2020 Apr;125(4):506-514. doi: 10.1111/bju.14987. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
6
Determinants for choosing and adhering to active surveillance for localised prostate cancer: a nationwide population-based study.局限性前列腺癌选择并坚持主动监测的决定因素:一项基于全国人口的研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e033944. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033944.
7
Validation of a 10-gene molecular signature for predicting biochemical recurrence and clinical metastasis in localized prostate cancer.验证一种 10 基因分子特征预测局限性前列腺癌生化复发和临床转移的能力。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 May;144(5):883-891. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2615-7. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
Biopsy Core Features are Poor Predictors of Adverse Pathology in Men with Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer.活检核心特征是预测低级别前列腺癌患者不良病理的不良指标。
J Urol. 2018 Apr;199(4):961-968. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Validation of prostate-specific antigen laboratory values recorded in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries.监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处记录的前列腺特异性抗原实验室值的验证。
Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;123(4):697-703. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30401. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
10
On Risk Estimation versus Risk Stratification in Early Prostate Cancer.早期前列腺癌的风险评估与风险分层
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 2;13(8):e1002100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002100. eCollection 2016 Aug.