Xiao Shuhai, Zhou Chuanming, Yuan Xunlai
Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA.
Nature. 2007 Apr 5;446(7136):E9-10; discussion E10-1. doi: 10.1038/nature05753.
Bailey et al. propose that the Ediacaran microfossils Megasphaera and Parapandorina, previously interpreted as animal resting eggs and blastula embryos, represent Thiomargarita-like sulphide-oxidizing bacteria, claiming that this interpretation better explains their abundance and taphonomy. Here we highlight important observations that significantly weaken the authors' conclusions.
贝利等人提出,埃迪卡拉纪微化石“大球藻”和“副盘球藻”,之前被解释为动物的休眠卵和囊胚胚胎,实际上代表的是类似硫珠菌的硫化物氧化细菌,他们声称这种解释能更好地说明它们的丰度和埋藏学特征。在此,我们强调一些重要的观察结果,这些结果显著削弱了作者的结论。