Chew Felix S, Llewellyn Kevin T, Olsen Kathryn M
Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1088, USA.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Nov;1(11):815-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.05.014.
Scholarly publishing is a large market involving thousands of peer-reviewed journals but a decreasing number of publishers. An economic model can be described in which authors give their work to publishers who then sell access to this work. Because each published article is a unique work with few if any substitutes, publishers have some degree of monopoly power and can price their products accordingly. The advent of desktop publishing using personal computers made it possible for individuals to publish material without publishers, an activity that gained momentum when the publishing medium shifted from paper to electronic, and from electronic publishing to the Internet. This activity destabilized the industry, and in the rush to gain market share by providing free content, unsustainable business models were created. Scholarly publishing is now dominated by a small number of multinational corporations that acquired many smaller publishing operations. As these companies have exercised their monopoly power, an open access movement has gained traction in which authors (or their institutions) initially pay for publication, but readers have free and open access to the published articles. This movement is in diametric opposition to the commercial publishing model, and it remains to be seen whether and how well the two can coexist in the future.
学术出版是一个庞大的市场,涉及数千种经过同行评审的期刊,但出版商的数量却在减少。可以描述一种经济模式,即作者将作品交给出版商,然后由出版商出售对该作品的访问权限。由于每篇发表的文章都是独一无二的作品,几乎没有替代品,出版商拥有一定程度的垄断权力,并可以据此对其产品定价。使用个人电脑的桌面出版的出现,使个人无需通过出版商就能出版材料,当出版媒介从纸质转向电子,再从电子出版转向互联网时,这种活动势头渐强。这种活动扰乱了该行业,在通过提供免费内容争夺市场份额的热潮中,出现了不可持续的商业模式。学术出版现在由少数跨国公司主导,这些公司收购了许多较小的出版业务。随着这些公司行使其垄断权力,开放获取运动开始兴起,在这种模式下,作者(或其机构)最初支付出版费用,但读者可以免费、开放地获取发表的文章。这一运动与商业出版模式截然相反,两者未来能否以及如何共存仍有待观察。