• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁为诊断成像付费,付多少?

Who gets paid for diagnostic imaging, and how much?

作者信息

Levin David C, Rao Vijay M, Parker Laurence, Maitino Andrea J, Sunshine Jonathan H

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Dec;1(12):931-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.001
PMID:17411735
Abstract

PURPOSES

To determine the apportionment of Medicare Part B payments for noninvasive diagnostic imaging among radiologists and other specialists and to ascertain the trends in these payments over a recent 5-year period.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using the nationwide Medicare Part B databases for 1997 through 2002, all payments were calculated for physician services for noninvasive diagnostic imaging codes in the 70,000 Current Procedural Terminology, Version 4 series and those codes in the 90,000 series pertaining to echocardiography and vascular ultrasound. Imaging studies were grouped into 26 different categories depending on type and modality. The 108 Medicare physician specialty codes were used to group payments into 20 different specialist categories. The percentage shares for each specialty group in 1997 and 2002 were calculated. Percentage changes in payments between 1997 and 2002 were determined.

RESULTS

In 2002, Medicare Part B paid almost $7.7 billion for noninvasive diagnostic imaging services. Radiologists received 48.3% of these payments, and cardiologists received 22.8%. Between 1997 and 2002, overall payments to physicians for noninvasive diagnostic imaging rose by 78%. Payments to radiologists increased by 65%, while payments to cardiologists increased by 105%. Primary-care physicians received 8.3% of 2002 payments, while 10.2% went to independent diagnostic testing facilities or multispecialty groups. For the latter two entities, the specialties of the physician providers could not be determined.

CONCLUSION

Radiologists receive only about half of all Medicare Part B reimbursements for noninvasive diagnostic imaging. Cardiologists receive almost one-quarter. Payments to cardiologists are rising more rapidly then to any other specialty group and considerably more rapidly than payments to radiologists.

摘要

目的

确定医疗保险B部分对非侵入性诊断成像向放射科医生及其他专科医生的支付分配情况,并查明最近5年期间这些支付的趋势。

方法和材料

利用1997年至2002年全国医疗保险B部分数据库,计算了70000个现行程序术语第4版系列中有关非侵入性诊断成像代码以及90000系列中有关超声心动图和血管超声代码的医生服务的所有支付。根据类型和方式将成像研究分为26个不同类别。使用108个医疗保险医生专科代码将支付分为20个不同的专科类别。计算了1997年和2002年每个专科组的百分比份额。确定了1997年至2002年期间支付的百分比变化。

结果

2002年,医疗保险B部分为非侵入性诊断成像服务支付了近77亿美元。放射科医生获得了这些支付的48.3%,心脏病专家获得了22.8%。1997年至2002年期间,医生的非侵入性诊断成像总体支付增长了78%。放射科医生的支付增长了65%,而心脏病专家的支付增长了105%。初级保健医生获得了2002年支付的8.3%,而10.2%支付给了独立诊断检测机构或多专科组。对于后两个实体,无法确定医生提供者的专科。

结论

放射科医生仅获得医疗保险B部分对非侵入性诊断成像所有报销的约一半。心脏病专家获得了近四分之一。心脏病专家的支付增长速度比任何其他专科组都快,而且比放射科医生的支付增长速度快得多。

相似文献

1
Who gets paid for diagnostic imaging, and how much?谁为诊断成像付费,付多少?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Dec;1(12):931-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.001.
2
Recent trends in utilization of cardiovascular imaging: how important are they for radiology?心血管成像利用的近期趋势:它们对放射学有多重要?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Sep;2(9):736-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.01.015.
3
Comparative increases in utilization rates of ultrasound examinations among radiologists, cardiologists, and other physicians from 1993 to 2001.1993年至2001年间放射科医生、心脏病专家及其他医生超声检查使用率的比较增长情况。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Aug;1(8):549-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.01.022.
4
The sharp reductions in medicare payments for noninvasive diagnostic imaging in recent years: will they satisfy the federal policymakers?近年来,医疗保险对无创性诊断成像的支付大幅减少:这能让联邦政策制定者满意吗?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Sep;9(9):643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.05.004.
5
Recent payment and utilization trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison between self-referral and referral to radiologists.放射性核素心肌灌注成像的近期支付与使用趋势:自我转诊与转诊给放射科医生的比较
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Jun;6(6):437-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.12.015.
6
The changing roles of radiologists, cardiologists, and vascular surgeons in percutaneous peripheral arterial interventions during a recent five-year interval.放射科医生、心脏病专家和血管外科医生在最近五年期间经皮外周动脉介入治疗中的角色变化。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Jan;2(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.08.028.
7
The controversy over advanced cardiovascular imaging: relative roles of radiologists, cardiologists, and other physicians in CT and MRI of the cardiovascular system.心血管高级成像的争议:放射科医生、心脏病专家及其他医生在心血管系统CT和MRI中的相对作用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Jan;3(1):16-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.09.014.
8
The Percent Share of All Medicare Payments to Physicians That Is Attributable to Noninvasive Diagnostic Imaging.所有 Medicare 支付给医生的款项中归因于无创诊断成像的比例。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 May;15(5):721-725. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
9
Recent trends in utilization rates of noncardiac thoracic imaging: an example of how imaging growth might be controlled.非心脏胸部成像利用率的近期趋势:一个关于如何控制成像增长的例子。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Dec;4(12):886-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.06.010.
10
The disproportionate effects of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on radiologists' private office MRI and CT practices compared with those of other physicians.与其他医生相比,2005年《减赤法案》对放射科医生私人诊所的磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)业务产生的不成比例影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Sep;6(9):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.05.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of MR Neuroimaging Services Billed by Radiologists versus Nonradiologists.放射科医生与非放射科医生开具的磁共振神经影像学服务的特征。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):1975-1980. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5807. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
2
Publication trends in noninvasive cardiovascular imaging: 1991-2011: a retrospective observational study.1991 - 2011年无创心血管成像的发表趋势:一项回顾性观察研究
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Nov 1;3(4):247-54. eCollection 2013.